1Thu Thuy Nguyen, 2Tran Minh Mai, 3Thi Phuong Anh Tran, 4Tra My Nguyen, 5Diem Quynh Pham, 6Vu Phuong Linh Le
1,2,3,4,5,6National Economics University, Viet Nam
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i03-64Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The study proposes a research model with two mediators, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Risk, to examine the impact of Technophobia on the Intention to Use e-Government of Vietnamese people. Through data analysis of 265 research samples collected from people nationwide, the research results found that Technophobia has a positive relationship with Perceived Risk. In addition, a direct relationship between Technophobia and Perceived Ease of Use and Intention to Use e-Government was not found. However, an indirect relationship between Technophobia and Intention to Use e-Government was demonstrated through the mediator Perceived Risk. Based on the research results, the authors propose to state management agencies solutions to reduce people's fear of technology and encourage people to use e-Government.
KEYWORDS:E-Government, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Risk, Technophobia, Intention Behavior
REFERENCES1) Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
2) Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government information quarterly, 30(3), 277-288
3) Alenezi, H., Tarhini, A., Alalwan, A., & Al-Qirim, N. (2017). Factors Affecting the Adoption of e‑Government in Kuwait: A Qualitative Study. Electronic Journal of E-government, 15(2), pp 84-102.
4) Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2012). Digitizing government interactions with constituents: an historical review of egovernment research in information systems. Journal of the Association for information Systems, 13(5), 1.
5) Carter, L. and Bélanger, F. (2005) The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25.
6) Chan, C. M., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. C. (2011). Managing e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541.
7) Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government adoption: testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850-865.
8) Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-government. Engineering Economics, 63(3).
9) Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology press.
10) Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e‐government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public administration review, 68(3), 523-536.
11) Curtin, G. G., Sommer, M. H., & Vis-Sommer, V. (2003). The world of e-government. Journal of Political Marketing, 2(3- 4), 1-16.
12) Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219.
13) Davis, F. D. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 984.
14) Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211-230.
15) Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211-230.
16) Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.
17) Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in US state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115-122.
18) Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.
19) Han, Y., Shao, X. F., Tsai, S. B. J., Fan, D., & Liu, W. (2021). E-government and foreign direct investment: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(6), 1-17.
Volume 08 Issue 03 March 2025
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 08 Issue 04 (April 2025).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 April 2025.
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.