• editor@ijmra.in
  • ISSN[Online] : 2643-9875  ||  ISSN[Print] : 2643-9840

Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2024

Refusal of Village Forest as Petalangan People Politic of Value in Community-Based Ecosystem Revitalization in Riau Indonesia
Tanti Budi Suryani
Department of Anthropology University of Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i06-56

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

This study is about the ethnography of the dynamics of Village Forest refusal as politic of value of the Petalangan People in Gondai Village, Pelalawan, Riau, in a community-based ecosystem revitalization of Teso Nilo (RETN) scheme. They refuse the social forestry scheme, which was proposed by themselves and a local non-governmental organization (NGO) and legalized by the state in 2017. The use of the refusal theory, relation of property, politic of value, and value commensuration approaches in studies of tenure claims by Indigenous people such as the Petalangan people, shows that the refusal here is the strategy of Indigenous People to get possibilities on claiming and using their land for commodity plantation such as palm oil and any of benefit to their interest, not as social forestry scheme regulates by government that some part of the forests must have the conservation zone. The Village Forest land at Mamahan Hamlet claimed by the Petalangan People full of palm oil plantations, housing, and all the public facilities for one hamlet. It shows from the relation of property of Petalangan People that the location of village forest is now under the control and ownership of migrants from North Sumatra, and only 1% of the total 9021 hectares are owned by themselves. The study found how NGO actors failed to mitigate conflict from internal politics inside the Petalangan People and only focused on how the legalization of Village Forests can be a solution to restore the Teso Nilo ecosystem. The implication is the revitalization of the ecosystem is only successful for legalizing the land and reducing conflict between the state and the Indigenous People, not for improving the environmental condition of the ecosystem. The theory used in this study gives nuance to the limited study using value theory to analyze the social forestry and Indigenous People that already have mono-crop culture livelihood in just the past two decades in Indonesia

KEYWORDS:

Petalangan People, refusal, politic of value, relation of property, social forestry

REFERENCES:
1) Agrawal, A, and Gibson, CC. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation, World Development Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 629±649, Elsevier.

2) Benda-Beckman, K. von. (1999). A Functionality of Property Rights, with Special Reference to Indonesia, dalam Meijl, Toon von, and Benda-Beckman, F. von., Property Rights and Economic Development: Land and Natural Resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania, Kegan Paul International.

3) D’Andrea, C, (2013), Kopi, Adat, Modal, Teritorialisasi dan Identitas Adat di Taman Nasional Lore Lindu Sulawesi Tengah, Sayogyo Institute – Tanah Air Beta – Yayasan Tanah Merdeka.

4) De Royer, S., Van Noordwijk, M., & Roshetko, J. M. (2018). Does community-based forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs? International Forestry Review, 20(2), 167–180.

5) De Witte, M. (2003). Money and Death: Funeral Business in Asante, Ghana. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 73(4), 531. doi:10.2307/3556778

6) Diansyah, W., Abas, A., & Sakawi, Z. (2021). A systematic review on community forest management in Southeast Asia: Current practices and impacts on biodiversity conservation and livelihood quality of local communities. Human Ecology Review, 27(1), 3–21. doi.org/10.22459/HER.27.01.2021.01.

7) Effendy, Tenas, (1997), “Petalangan Society and Changes in Riau.” In Riau in Transition, edited by Cynthia Chou and Will Derks. BKI 153, 4

8) Erbaugh, James T, (2019), Responsibilization and Social Forestry in Indonesia, Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 109, December 2019, 102019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019

9) Ekonomi Hijau, Edisi April 2018: 41 – 48, Revitalisasi Taman Nasional Teso Nilo (TNTN): Pemulihan Ekosistem yang Menjamin Hak Masyarakat (tidak dipublikasikan)

10) Fisher, M R., Dhiaulhaq, A, Sahide, M A K., The politics, economies, and ecologies of indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section, Forest and Society. Vol. 3(1): 152-170, April 2019

11) Graeber, D, Culture as Creative Refusal, Cambridge Anthropology 31(2), Autumn 2013: 1–19, doi:10.3167/ca.2013.310201

12) Graeber, D. (2013). It is Value that Brings Universes into Being, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 219–43

13) Lambek, M, The Value (Performative) Acts, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013.3:141-160.

14) Lounela, A. (2020).' Contested values and climate change mitigation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia ', Social Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 862-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12790

15) McGranahan, C. (2016). Theorizing Refusal: An Introduction, CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 319–325, ISSN 0886-7356, online ISSN 1548-1360. by the American Anthropological Association. DOI: 10.14506/ca31.3.01.

16) Moore, S F. (1973). Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719-746.

17) Ortner, S B. (1995). Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Jan., 1995, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 173-193 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/179382

18) Pramudya, EP., Hospes, O., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2018). The disciplining of illegal palm oil plantations in Sumatra, Third World Quarterly, 39:5, 920-940, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1401462

19) Pulhin, J M., and Tapia, M. (2002). Beyond the 'Mythic Community': Enhancing Collective Action in Community-Based Forest Management, Philippine Sociological Review, January-December 2002, Vol. 50 (JanuaryDecember 2002), pp. 73-88, Philippine Sociological Society

20) Effendy, T. (1997). Bujang Tan Domang: Sastra Lisan Orang Petalangan. Yogyakarta: Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient,

21) -------------------, (2002). The Orang Petalangan of Riau and their Forest Environment. In Tribal Communities in the Malay World: Historical, Cultural and Social Perspectives (pp. 364-383). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute

22) McCarthy, J, and Robinson, K, ed. (2016). Land and Development in Indonesia: Searching for the People's Sovereignty, ISEAS – Yushof Ishak Institute, Singapore.

23) Santoso, H. (2023). Akhir yang Tidak Selesai: Gelombang Kedatangan Tanaman dan Perubahan Wilayah Pedalaman, Interlude, Yogyakarta.

24) Scott, J C. (2018). Seeing like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University.

25) Royyani, M F. (2018). Disertasi, Cagar Biosfer: Perubahan Status Kawasan, Relasi Sosial, dan Relasi Manusia-Alam dalam Isu Konservasi, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat (dipublikasikan dalam buku: Manusia Kosmis: Relasi Biodiversitas dalam Isu Konservasi, Pustaka Kompas, 2021).

26) Hamdi, M. (2015). Thesis, Efek Lapindo: Transformasi Lanskap, Relasi Sosio Spasial, dan Komensurasi Nilai, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat (Tidak Dipublikasikan).

27) Kang, Y. (2002). Disertasi, Words of the Ancestors, Words for Survival: Marginality, Emotion and the Power of Magical Words among the Petalangan of Riau, Indonesia, Yale University

28) Tsing, A L. (2015). Mushroom at the End of the World: on the Possibility of Capitalist Ruins, Princeton University Press.

29) Eyes on the Forest, Juni 2021. Omnibus Law bukan legalisasi otomatis untuk kebun-kebun sawit illegal. https://www.eyesontheforest.or.id/reports/omnibus-law-bukan-legalisasi-otomatis-untuk-perkebunan-sawit-ilegal

30) Latin, August 2022, Creative Learning Ecosystem: Konsep, Gagasan, dan Strategi, untuk Strategi Sosial Forestri Indonesia 2045, Lembaga Alam Tropika Nusantara (Latin), Bogor

31) Wahana Lingkungan Hidup (WALHI), 2019, Studi Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial Selama Periode Pemerintahan Jokowi – Jusuf Kalla, WALHI, Jakarta https://drive.google.com/file/d/18uXMOnX3xALy_jXUMEKPlSCJajJxLYHu/view
Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2024

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Our Services and Policies

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.

The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.

Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 07 (July 2024).

PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 July 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online

Why with us

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis is better then other journals because:-
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.

The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

Indexed In
Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar