1Muhammad Adam Fatihurrahman, 2Duwi Kurnianto Pambudi, 3Enggista Hendriko Delano
1,2,3Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, Yogyakarta State University.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i05-33Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
Evaluation of Bhayangkara Presisi Football Club Achievement Development Management. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Masters Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, 2024. The aim of this research is to find out the evaluation of the Bhayangkara Presisi Football Club's achievement development program, examining it from the context, input, Process and Product (CIPP) aspects as well as finding out whether the achievement development program that has been running at the Bhayangkara Presisi Football Club has been managed optimally. This research is a type of quantitative and qualitative research with the CIPP evaluation model. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique to obtain a sample of three program administrators, three coaches and six players. Evaluation uses quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data collection uses research instruments in the form of observation, questionnaires, interviews and documentation. The results of the research, namely, Context evaluation of Bhayangkara Presisi FC's achievement coaching management, amounted to 2.91, which is in the good category. Based on the background indicators of the coaching program, it is 3.09 in the good category, the coaching program objectives are 2.60 in the good category, and the coaching program is 3.03 in the good category. The evaluation input for Bhayangkara Presisi FC's achievement coaching management, amounting to 2.75, is in the good category. Based on the human resources indicator, it is 3.07 in the good category, the trainer program is 3.05 in the good category, funding is 2.66 in the good category, facilities and infrastructure is 2.66 in the good category, and parental support is 2.29 in the poor category. Bhayangkara Presisi FC's achievement management evaluation process, amounting to 2.83, is in the good category. Based on the program implementation indicator, it is 3.06 in the good category, and coordination is 2.83 in the good category. Bhayangkara Presisi FC's performance management management evaluation product, amounting to 3.27, is in the good category. Based on the achievement indicator of 3.33 in the good category and welfare of 3.20 in the good category.
KEYWORDS:Evaluation, Achievement Development Program, Bhayangkara Presisi FC
REFERENCES1) Abas, R., Sugiharto, S., & Sulaiman, S. (2019). The regional government policy towards the development of sports facilities and infrastructure in Ternate City, North Maluku Province. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 8(6), 186- 191.
2) Abidin, K. Z., & Yuwono, C. (2021). Pembinaan prestasi atlet Paracycling National Paralympic Committee of Indonesia di Surakarta tahun 2020. Indonesian Journal for Physical Education and Sport, 2(1), 130- 136.
3) Abrar, I. I., & Fitroni, H. (2021). Pembinaan cabang olahraga bola basket pada usia dibawa 20 tahun di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kesehatan Olahraga, 9(04).
4) Aji, S. W., & Supriyono, S. (2021). Survei pembinaan prestasi atlet dayung pada PODSI Kabupaten Pati Tahun 2020. Indonesian Journal for Physical Education and Sport, 2, 94-99.
5) Akamigbo, I. S., & Eneja, R. U. (2020). Evaluation of financial accounting curriculum in senior secondary schools in Nigeria. Nnadiebube Journal of Education, 5(3).
6) Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2), 104-116.
7) Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum for kindergarten using Stufflebeam‘s CIPP model. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244018822380.
8) Amin, A. K., Doewes, M., & Purnama, S. K. (2017). Development of prototype: a swinging training aid tool ―Swing Trainer‖ on woodball male athletes. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(4).
9) Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publishing.
10) Areli, A. J., Lian, B., & Kristiawan, M. (2020). An Evaluation of implementation industrial work practice programs in vocational school. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 20(2), 179-186.
11) Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: PT Bukit, A. V.,
12) Bastari, A., & Putra, G. E. (2019). Evaluation of learning programs in Indonesian Naval Technology College with the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(20), 3823- 3827.
13) Cahya, A. C. A., Yazida, I. Y. P. I., Saniyah, R. S. R., & Sucipto, S. (2021, September). Peran penting penyusunan desain evaluasi bagi pelaksanaan program pelatihan. In Seminar Nasional Peta Jalan Pendidikan dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Vol. 1, No. 1).
14) Danardono (2012). Program Pembinaan Prestasi Atlet Kota Yogyakarta Pemusatan Latihan Kota Yogyakarta. Tersedia pada http://staff.uny.ac.id Diakses pada 26 Januari 2024.
15) Damayanti, E. S. (2019). Evaluasi program pembinaan cabang olahraga karate Satlak Prima tahun 2011-2017. Jurnal Penjaskesrek, 6(1), 11-20.
16) Darmawati, I., & Susilo, P. (2019). Analisa koordinasi, komunikasi dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja pegawai sekretariat DPRD Kota Tangerang. JMB: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 8(2).
17) De Bosscher, V., Brockett, C., & Westerbeek, H. (2016). Elite youth sport policy and dual career support services in fifteen countries. Routledge Handbook of Youth Sport.
18) Dehghansai, N., Spedale, D., Wilson, M. J., & Baker, J. (2020). Comparing developmental trajectories of elite able-bodied and wheelchair basketball players. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 37(3), 338-348.
19) Dewi, P. C. P., & Vanagosi, K. D. (2019). Evaluasi program pembinaan prestasi panahan pengkab perpani Karangasem. Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 5(2), 101-111.
20) Diatmika, I. P. W., Yoda, I. K., & Tisna, G. D. (2021). Evaluasi program pembinaan prestasi cabang olahraga bulutangkis di persatuan bulutangkis (pb) Anugerah Denpasar dengan metode contex, input, procces, product (CIPP). Indonesian Journal of Sport & Tourism, 1(1).
21) D'Isanto, T., D'Elia, F., Raiola, G., & Altavilla, G. (2019). Assessment of sportperformance: Theoretical aspects and practical indications. Sport Mont, 17(1), 79-82.
22) Djatmiko. (2011). Pelatihan Instruktur Kebugaran. Surabaya: Dapartemen Faal Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga.Djoko pekik irianto. (2002). Dasar Kepelatihan. Yogyakarta: Andi
23) Dohsten, J., Barker-Ruchti, N., & Lindgren, E. C. (2020). Caring as sustainable coaching in elite athletics: benefits and challenges. Sports Coaching Review, 9(1), 48–70.
24) Doncaster, G., Medina, D., Drobnic, F., Gómez-Díaz, A. J., & Unnithan, V. (2020). Appreciating factors beyond the physical in talent identification and development: insights from the FC Barcelona sporting model. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, 91.
25) Doufexi, T., & Pampouri, A. (2020). Evaluation of employees‘vocational training programmes and professional development: A case study in Greece. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 1477971420979724.
26) Febriana, R. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
27) Fitriyani, F., & Robiasih, R. H. (2021). An evaluation of Muhadatsah Program at Pondok Modern Daarul Abror using CIPP Model. Journal of Applied Linguistics, Translation, and Literature, 1(1), 7-16.
28) Fukuda, D. H. (2018). Assessments for sport and athletic performance. Human Kinetics.
29) Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
30) Gordon, Dan. (2009). Coaching science. Britain: Learning Matters Ltd.
31) Gullickson, A. M. (2020). The whole elephant: Defining evaluation. Evaluation and program planning, 79, 101787.
32) Gunung, I. N., & Darma, I. K. (2019). Implementing the context, input, process, product (CIPP) evaluation model to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of teaching at
33) Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(1), 33-39.
34) Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiwaty, J., Utami, E. F.,
35) Harsuki. (2012). Pengantar manajemen olahraga. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
36) Irmansyah, J. (2017). Evaluasi program pembinaan prestasi cabang olahraga bola voli pantai. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 5(1), 24-38. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i1.12759.
37) Istofian, R. S., & Amiq, F. (2016). Metode drill untuk meningkatkan teknik menendang bola (shooting) dalam permainan sepakbola usia 13-14 tahun. Jurnal Kepelatihan Olahraga, 1(1).
38) Nugroho, W. A. (2017). Pembinaan Prestasi Olahraga Sepakbola Di Pusat Pendidikan Dan Latihan Putra Batang. Juara: Jurnal Olahraga, 2(2), 162–173.
39) Putra, Gerry. "Stadion PTIK Jadi Kandang Bhayangkara FC Musim 2018". Bolalob - Situsnya Anak Futsal!. Diakses tanggal 28 Januari 2024
40) Rekyan Woro Mulaksito Mulyadi. (2015). Pembinaan Prestasi Cabang Olahraga Basket Lapangan di Kabupaten Sleman. Skripsi.. Program Studi PJKR Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
41) Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Wonosari: CV. Pustaka Ilmu. Harsono. (2015). Kepelatihan olahraga. (teori dan metodologi
Volume 07 Issue 05 May 2024
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 11 (November 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 November 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.