1Warsito Eko Putro , 2Endang Larasati S , 3Wijayanto, 4Yuwanto
1Doctor of Public Administration, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang-Indonesia
2Public of Administration, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang-Indonesia
3,4Government of Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang-Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i04-14Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The issue of protecting Indonesian migrant workers is currently still completely dominated by the government's role in handling it. There is no involvement of non-governmental elements to synergize with each other. Apart from that, the protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers only focuses on Indonesian Migrant Workers who experience problems and has not yet touched on the realm of prevention or preventative action. This research will analyze and identify obstacles and supporting factors in collaborative governance in the context of protecting Indonesian Migrant Workers. Apart from that, it is also reviewing and constructing a collaborative governance model in order to handle the protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers more appropriately. The method used in this research uses ethnographic qualitative methods. Collaborative governance in the protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers can be studied comprehensively in terms of initial conditions, institutional design, leadership and collaboration processes. So it is important to carry out more in-depth research into existing phenomena from a collaborative governance perspective. The research method used by the researcher is a qualitative approach by conducting interviews with all informants related to Indonesian Migrant Worker affairs. The results of this research found that collaborative governance in protecting Indonesian Migrant Workers has not gone well, because of the presence of actors who have economic and political interests. Apart from that, cooperation that is not yet optimal and not in harmony is characterized by a lack of involvement of non-government stakeholders in the collaboration process.
KEYWORDS:Collaborative Governance; Migrant Workers; Indonesia
REFERENCES1) Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 18 (4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
2) Baggio, R.; Cooper, C. (2010). Knowledge transfer in a tourism destination: The effects of a network structure. Serv. Ind. J. , 30 , 1757–1771.
3) Beaumont, N.; Dredge, D. (2010). Local tourism governance: A comparison of three network approaches. J. Sustain , 18 , 7–28.
4) Bets, L.; Lamers, M.; Tatenhove, J. (2017). Collective self-governance in a marine community: Expedition cruise tourism at Svalbard. J. Sustain. Tour. , 25 , 1583–1599.
5) Bichler, B. . (2019). Designing tourism governance: The role of local residents. J. Destin .
6) Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., Middleton Stone, M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: necessary and challenging. Public Adm. Rev , 74 (5), 647–663.
7) CJAM Termeer, A.D. (2018). A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494 035.2018.1497933.
8) CM Kossmann, JH Behagel, MB (2016). Action and inertia in collaborative governance. Marine Policy , 72 , 21–30.
9) Creswell, J. W. & J. D. C. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition . Sage Publications, Inc.
10) Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. and Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory , 22 (1), 1–29.
11) F. Berkes. (2007). Community-Based Conservation in a Globalized World . The National Academy of Sciences of the USA.
12) Jamal, TB; Watt, E.M. (2011). Climate change pedagogy and performative action: Toward community-based destination governance. J. Sustain. Tour , 19 , 571–588.
13) KA Waylen, A. Fisher, PJK McGowan, SJ Thirgood, EJM-G. (2010). Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conserv. Biol. Ume , 24 (4), 1119–1129.
14) Keyim, P. (2017). Tourism collaborative governance and rural community development in Finland: The case of Vuonislahti. J. Travel Res. , 57 , 483–494.
15) ME Mendez-Lopez, E. García-Frapolli, DJ Pritchard, MCS Gonzalez, I. Ruiz Mallen, L. Porter-Bolland, VR-G. (2014). Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: a comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico. Environmental Management , 145 , 321–329.
16) McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Adm. Rev , 66 , 33–43.
17) Nelson, L.S.; Robbins, MD; Simonsen, B. (1998). Introduction to the Special Issue on Governance. Social Science , 35 , 477–491.
18) Newig, J., Challies, E.D., Jager, N.W., Kochskaemper, E., Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: a framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Stud. Journal , 46 (2), 269–297. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/psj.12209
19) Patricia Leavy. (2017). Research Design Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches . The Guilford Press.
20) R. Pomeroy, J. Parks, R. Pollnac, T. Campson, E. Genio, C. Marlessy, E. Holle, M. Pido, A. Nissapa, S. Boromthanarat, N. Thu Hue R. Pomeroy, J. Parks, R. Pollnac, T. Campson, E. Genio, C. Marlessy, E. Holle, M. Pido, A. Nissapa, S. Boromthanarat, NTH (2007). Fish wars: conflict and collaboration in fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Mar. Policy , 31 , 645–656.
21) Robertson, P. . (2011). An assessment of collaborative governance in a network for sustainable tourism: The case of RedeTuris. Journal of Public Administration , 34 , 279–290.
22) Scott, T. A., Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies? Policy Stud. Journal , 45 (1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12162.
23) Trent, A., & Cho, J. (2014). Evaluating qualitative research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research(pp. 677–696) . Oxford University Press.
24) van der Zee, E.; Gerrets, A.-M.; Vanneste, D. (2017). Complexity in the governance of tourism networks: Balancing between external pressure and internal expectations. J Destin. Manag. , 6 , 296–308.
Volume 07 Issue 04 April 2024
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.