1Ghullam Hamdu, 2Deni Hadiana, 3Ade Yulianto, 4Lutfi Nur, 5Ahmad Mulyadiprana
1,2,3,4,5Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i12-42Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) aims to ensure that every student acquires the knowledge and skills needed for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles. Another important aspect of ESD is the integration of cognitive and affective components, which are dominant in broadening students' understanding. The ability to be critically disposed is necessary to underpin students' perspectives on sustainable development. This study aims to develop and measure students' critical thinking disposition in ESD-oriented learning. The method used is a pre-experimental design with a one-group pretest-posttest design. The collected data on the critical thinking disposition of elementary school students will be processed through Rasch modeling using racking analysis techniques. The results of the study show that the critical thinking disposition instrument filled out by students experienced a significant 80% change in difficulty level, indicating an improvement in students' critical thinking disposition. This implies that students are enabled to contribute and participate in the process of sustainable development in various types and dimensions, with transformative and reflective processes that strive to integrate sustainability values and perceptions not only into the education system but also into students' daily lives.
Keywords:Racking Analysis, ESD, Critical Thinking Disposition, Rasch Modeling, Elementary School Students.
REFERENCES1) Almerico, G. M. (2014). Building Character through Literacy with Children’s Literature. Research in Higher Education Journal, 26.
2) Ana, M. . (2012). A Study of the Internal Structure of Critical Thinking Dispositions. Spring, 27, 31-38.
3) Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.
4) Arth, Z. W., Griffin, D. J., & Earnest, W. J. (2019). Professors’ Perspectives on Truth-Seeking and New Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 11(3), 61–72.
5) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education 8th edition, Wardswoth Cengage Learning. Canada: Nelson Education Ltd Exotic Classic.
6) Assaraf, O. B., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540–563.
7) Astawa, I., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2018). The Process of Student Cognition in Constructing Mathematical Conjecture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 15–26.
8) Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2008). Deductive reasoning: In the eye of the beholder. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 235–247.
9) Beaumont, S. L. (2009). Identity processing and personal wisdom: An information-oriented identity style predicts self-actualization and self-transcendence. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9(2), 95–115.
10) Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2013). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer.
11) Borowske, K. (2005). Curiosity and Motivation to Learn. ACRL Twelfth National Conference. April 7-10, 2005, Minnesota.
12) Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
13) Cesur, E., & Yaralı, K. T. (2019). Humour styles and critical thinking dispositions in adolescents. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.
14) Chen, V. (2015). “There is No single right answer”: the potential for active learning classrooms to facilitate actively open-minded thinking. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 171–180.
15) Cotton, K. (1991). Teaching thinking skills. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, School Improvement Program.
16) Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 4th Edition. Sage publications, Inc.
17) Dabaj, F. (2011). Analysis of communication barriers to distance education: A review study.
18) de Haan, G. (1999). Zu den Grundlagen der “Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung” in der Schule. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 27(3), 252–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25656/01:7735
19) de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32. a. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500526362
20) de Haan, G., & Seintz, K. (2001). Kriterien für die Umsetzung eines internationalen Bildungsauftrages. Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung (Teil 1 und 2). Www.Transfer-21.de/Daten/Texte/Bildungsauftrag.Pdf.
21) Demirhan, E., & Köklükaya, A. N. (2014). The critical thinking dispositions of prospective science teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1551–1555.Eckman, M., & Frey, D. K. (2005). Using the WebCT NAFTA program to promote analytical thinking and global awareness competencies through a team approach. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 23(4), 278–289.
22) Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2006). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. (No Title).
23) Emiliannur. (2019). Efektivitas Asesmen Kinerja dalam Mengembangkan Disposisi Berpikir Kritis Fisika Siswa SMA. S3 Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
24) Ennis, R. H, Millman J. & Tomko, T. N. (2005). The Cornell Critical Thinking Tests, Level X and Z",. (5thed. revised), Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
25) Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. University of Illinois.
26) Facione, P. A., Norren, C.F., and Carrol, A. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Informal Logic, 20, 61-84.
27) Facione, P. and Carrol, A. (2013). Think Critically: Skilled and eager to think. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, inc.
28) Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.
29) Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.
30) Friede, C. R., Irani, T. A., Rhoades, E. B., Fuhrman, N. E., & Gallo, M. (2008). It’s in the Genes: Exploring Relationships between Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Agriscience Students’ Solutions to Problems in Mendelian Genetics. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(4), 25–37.
31) Giancarlo, C. A., & Facione, P. A. (2001). A look across four years at the disposition toward critical thinking among undergraduate students. The Journal of General Education, 29–55.
32) Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449.
33) Hendriana, H., Sumarmo, U., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2016). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik serta Kemampuan dan Disposisi Berpikir Kritis Matematik. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1). a. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v2i1.97
34) Hoffmann, T., & Siege, H. (2018). What is Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)? Human Development, 1(8), 1–6. a. http://www.esd-expert.net/files/ESD-Expert/pdf/Was_wir_tun/Lehr-und Lernmaterialien/What_is_Education_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf%0Ahttp://www.esd-expert.net/teaching-and-learning-materials.html
35) Kao, C. (2014). Exploring the relationships between analogical, analytical, and creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 80–88.
36) Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). Contributions of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) to Quality Education: A Synthesis of Research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442
37) Maclellan, E. (2014).How might teachers enable learner self-confidence?A review study.Educational Review,66(1),59–74.
38) Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the ‘new’discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504032
39) Moore, K. (2010). The three-part harmony of adult learning, critical thinking, and decision-making. Journal of Adult Education, 39(1), 1–10.
40) Nikolic, V., Vukic, T., Maletaski, T., & Andevski, M. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards sustainable development in Serbia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 33–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0336
41) Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. ERIC.Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 425–432.
42) Profetto‐McGrath, J. (2003). The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(6), 569–577.
43) Santhitiwanich, A., Pasiphol, S., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2014). The integration of indicators of reading, analytical thinking and writing abilities with indicators of subject content. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4854–4858.
44) Şar, A. H., Avcu, R., & Işıklar, A. (2010). Analyzing undergraduate students’ self confidence levels in terms of some variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1205–1209.
45) Shin, K., Jung, D. Y., Shin, S., & Kim, M. S. (2006). Critical thinking dispositions and skills of senior nursing students in associate, baccalaureate, and RN-to-BSN programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 233.
46) Smolova, L. V. (2019). Systematic thinking as a factor in implementing sustainable development. Sustainability and the Humanities, 443–454.
47) Stedman, N. L. P., & Andenoro, A. C. (2007). Identification of relationships between emotional intelligence skill and critical thinking disposition in undergraduate leadership students. Journal of Leadership Education, 6(1), 190–208.
48) Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim komunikata.
49) Tavani, C. M., & Losh, S. C. (2003). Motivation, self-confidence, and expectations as predictors of the academic performances among our high school students. Child Study Journal, 33(3), 141–152.
50) Tishman, S. (1994). Thinking dispositions and intellectual character. In American Educational Research Association Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
51) Tümkaya, S., Aybek, B., & Aldaş, H. (2009). An Investigation of University Students’ Critical Thinking Disposition and Perceived Problem Solving Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 36.
52) Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1). a. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649
53) UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals Learning Objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
54) Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25–50.
55) Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro, V. C. (2014). Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,14(4),659–680.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
56) Walliman, N. (2017). Research methods: The basics. Routledge.
57) Wanabuliandari, S., Ardianti, S. D., Gunarhadi, G., & Rejekiningsih, T. (2021). Study Analysis of Confidence Level on Slow Learner Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(4), 584–592.
58) Watson, G. (2008). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal short form manual. USA: NCS Pearson.
59) Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Dasar-Dasar untuk Praktik. In Bandung: UPI PRESS.
60) Yang, Y. C., & Chou, H. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies.British Journal of Educational Technology,39(4),666–684.
Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 08 Issue 03 (March 2025).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 March 2025.
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.