1Ridho Halasan Falintin Sitorus, 2Marthinus Masriat, 3Anny Retnowati
1,2Students Of Magister Of Law Program, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3Lecturer of Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-09Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
This research examines the role and complex relationship between the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and its Supervisory Board, with a focus on the Supervisory Board's function as a supervisor of accountability and integrity. The KPK Supervisory Board, which is known for its vigorous anti-corruption initiatives, has institutional control over the organization. This study examines how this supervision impacts the effectiveness of the Corruption Eradication Committee and considers whether the Supervisory Board supports efforts to eradicate corruption or is actually an obstacle to efforts to eradicate corruption. The history of the development of the KPK, the formation and duties of the Supervisory Board, as well as the legislative structure that regulates its affairs, are all included in the examination. In addition, this research also evaluates specific cases where the Supervisory Board's actions influenced the direction of KPK investigations and activities. This research takes a balanced approach, respecting the value of accountability systems but also considering any weaknesses resulting from overly burdensome supervision. The role of the Supervisory Board in preventing abuse of power, harmony between autonomy and accountability, and the impact of the Supervisory Board's decisions on the effectiveness and morale of the Corruption Eradication Commission are some of the main themes raised. Through critical analysis of these elements, this research adds a deeper understanding of the complex interactions between the Corruption Eradication Commission and its Supervisory Board and sheds light on the broader discussion in Indonesia regarding institutional checks and balances and anti-corruption initiatives.
KEYWORDS:Supervisory Board, Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption, Watcher of the watcher
REFERENCES1) E. Fernando M. Manullang, Misinterpretasi Ide Gustav Radbruch mengenai Doktrin Filosofis tentang Validitas dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang, Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
2) Terry Hutchinson, Researching and Writing in Law, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited, Pyrmont, 2018, h. 7.
3) Muhammad Syahrum, Keberadaan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Revisi UU KPK, Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 31 Januari 2022. h. 87
4) Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi, Pendidikan Hukum De Jure Vol.19 No.4 (Desember 2019) h. 522-524
5) Iqbal Maulanan, Mas Anienda Tiem Fitriyah, Peran Dewan Pengawas KPK Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia, Law and Social Political Governance Vol. 3 No.1 (Januari-April 2023), h. 965
6) Kedudukan Dewan Pengawas KPK Terhadap Eksistensi KPK Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Simbur cahaya, Vol. XXIX No.2, Desember 2022, h. 311.
7) Bambang Widjojanto & Abdul Fickar Hadjar, Reformasi Dikorupsi, KPK Dihabisi: Sebuah Catatan Kritis, Malang, Intrans Publishing, 2020, h. 59.
8) Ridwan Azali, Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Langkah Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pejabat di Indinesia Periode 2015-2020, Das Sollen Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, ISSN 1111-1111, Oktober 2022
9) Arman Tjoneng, Christin Septina Basani, Novalina Sidabutar, Menguji Kewenangan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberian Izin Penggeledahan Sebagai Tindakan Merintangi Proses Penyidukan (Obstruction- Of Justice), Esensi Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2020. H. 58-61
10) Saiful Anwar, Sendi-Sendi Hukum Administrasi Negara, (Jakarta: Glora Madani Press, 2004), h.127.
11) Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi, “Telaah Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Perspektif Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence”, Lex Jurnalica vol. 17, No. 3 (Desember 2020): h. 307.
12) Mario Julyano, Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan, Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum, Jurnal Crepido, Volume 01 No. 01 (Juli 2019) h. 14-15.
13) R. Tony Prayogo, Penerapan Asas Kepastiav n Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang, Legislasi Indonesia Vol. 13 No. 2 (Juni 2016), Hal 194-195.
14) Transparency International, Corruption Perception Index 2016, https://riset.ti.or.id/corruption-perceptions-index-2016/, 1 Desember 2023
15) Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2017, https://riset.ti.or.id/corruption-perceptions-index-2016/ , 1 Desember 2023
16) Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2018, https://ti.or.id/corruption-perception-index-2018/ , 1 Desember 2023
17) Transparency International, Corruption Perceptio0ns Index 2020, https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-2020-korupsi-respons-covid-19-dan-kemunduran-demokrasi/#:~:text=Indonesia%20sejak%20pertama%20kali%20CPI,dari%20180%20negara%20yang%20disurvei, 1 Desember 2023
18) SustaIN, Naik 1 Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi (CPI) Indonesia Tahun 2021 Masih Dibawah Rata-rata, https://sustain.id/2022/02/03/naik-1-skor-indeks-persepsi-korupsi-cpi-indonesia-tahun-2021-masih-dibawah-rata-rata/, 1 Desember 2023
19) Nafiatul Munawaroh, Perbandingan Sistem Pengawasan Lembaga Antikorupsi Di Asia Pasifik, Lex Renaissan No. 3 Vol.6 (Juli 2021) h.508-510
20) Dalinama Telaumbanua , Restrikktif Status Dewan Pengawas KPK, Education and Development, Vol. 8 No. 1 (Februari 2020)
Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.