1Nicolaus Reza Adriyanto, 2Yudanto, 3Abdul Alim, 4Risti Nuradila, 5Wahyu Dwi Yulianto
1,2,3,4,5Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-27Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to analyze the results of context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation of extracurricular activities at Elementary Schools in Purworejo Regency. This qualitative descriptive study uses a quantitative and qualitative approach (mixed method). The subjects of this study were principals, extracurricular coaches, and students at Elementary Schools in Purworejo, including one principal, one extracurricular coach, and several students from each Elementary School in Purworejo Regency who were willing to become samples and filled out questionnaires from researchers. The samples in this study were five school principals, five extracurricular coaches, and 50 students. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentage techniques, while qualitative data were presented through data presentation, reduction, and conclusion drawing. The results showed the evaluation of extracurricular activities in Elementary Schools in Purworejo Regency were in the category of poor. Furthermore, each aspect of the evaluation is explained; (1) Context evaluation was in good categories. The indicators of each aspect were as follows: extracurricular background had a result of 2.64 which means it was in the good category; extracurricular goals had a result of 2.39 which means it was in poor category; and extracurricular programs, with a result of 2.47 which means it was in poor category. Then, from those three indicators in context, it had a result of 2.50 meaning it was in good category. (2) Input evaluation was in poor category. The indicators of each aspect were as follows: student condition had a result of 2.47 which was in poor category, facilities had a result of 2.37 which was in poor category, the extracurricular coaches’ competence had a result of 2.53 which was in good category. Then, from those three indicators, the result was 2.46 which was in poor category. (3) The evaluation process was in poor category. The indicators of each aspect are the implementation of extracurricular activities with a result of 2.29, which was in poor category, the evaluation of the extracurricular program of 2.40 which was in poor category, too. Then, from both of indicators, the result was 2.34 which was in poor category. (4) Product evaluation was in the poor category. The indicators of each aspect were results of extracurricular activities of 2.27 which was in poor category, so from this indicator, it could be concluded that in the process resulted in 2.27 which was in poor category.
KEYWORDS:Evaluation, Extracurricular, Sepak Takraw
REFERENCES1) Arifudin, O. (2022). Optimalisasi Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler dalam Membina Karakter Peserta Didik. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(3), 829-837.
2) Arini, I., Rahmat, A., & Suharto, T. H. (2021). Evaluasi Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Olahraga Di MAN 1 Serang. Jurnal Pendidikan Setia Budhi, 1(21), 31-34.
3) Asmani, J. M. (2011). Buku Panduan Internalisasi Penddikan Karakter di Sekolah. Diva Press.
4) Bimper Jr, A. Y. (2017). Mentorship of Black student-athletes at a predominately White American university: Critical race theory perspective on student-athlete development. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 175-193.
5) Marzuan, M. (2018). Manajemen Ekstrakurikuler dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Kecerdasan Siswa Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri (Mtsn) Kota Sawahlunto. al-fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 207-218.
6) Mulyasa, E. (2003). Menjadi kepala sekolah profesional dalam konteks menyukseskan MBS dan KBK.
7) Noor, R. M. (2012). The Hidden Curriculum. Insan Madani
8) Nuryanto, S. (2017). Manajemen Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler di SD Al Irsyad 01 Purwokerto. Jurnal Kependidikan, Vol. 5, No .1.
9) Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluastion model: how to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York: The Guilford Press.
10) Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Remaja Rosda Karya
11) Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
12) Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Insan Madani.
13) Tarbiyah, F., Keguruan, D. A. N., Ar-raniry, U. I. N., & Aceh, D. B. (2019). Pembinaan Prestasi Non Akademik Siswa.
VOLUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.