¹Ismediyono, ²Guntur, ³Heni Susilowati, ⁴Afeb Chesa Arianto

^1,2,3,4Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta Indonesia

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the facilities and infrastructure used in learning Physical Education Sports and Health in Elementary Schools in the Kapanewon Patuk Regional Office of Education, Gunung Kidul using the CIPP model which includes aspects of Context, Input, Process, and product. The research subjects consisted of principals and teachers. Data collection methods included documentation, observation, and interviews. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive techniques. The results showed that the condition and feasibility of facilities and infrastructure for game sports are still not good with an interval value of 49%, while the interval value for gymnastics and athletics are 31% and 26% respectively, with the overall interval value of the three types of sports is 35%. Fulfillment of standardization is also still not good with a value of 27%. However, the implementation of Physical Education, Sports, and Health learning is good with a score of 67% and the learning outcomes of Physical Education, Sports, and Health reached 75%. Therefore, although there are still shortcomings, the creativity and innovation of teachers in teaching have made the learning process of Physical Education, Sports, and Health run well and the fulfillment of the minimum completeness criteria for Physical Education, Sports, and Health subjects is fulfilled. The suggestion given is that there is a need for improvement and improvement in facilities and infrastructure, fulfillment of standards stipulated in regulations, use of appropriate learning methods and techniques, and increasing student involvement in sports activities to improve the quality of learning Physical Education, Sports, and Health in Elementary Schools in the Kapanewon Patuk Regional Office of Education, Gunungkidul Regency. In addition, special improvements need to be made to improve students' learning achievements in sports that are still poor through additional training or intensive activities.

Evaluation, Learning, Physical education, sport and health, Elementary school, Gunungkidul Regency

1) Adi, S., & Fathoni, A. F. (2019). Development of Learning Model Based on Blended Learning in Sports School. 5th International Conference on Physical Education, Sport, and Health (ACPES 19), 8–12.

2) Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550–567.

3) Cattuzzo, M. T., dos Santos Henrique, R., Ré, A. H. N., de Oliveira, I. S., Melo, B. M., de Sousa Moura, M., de Araújo, R. C., & Stodden, D. (2016). Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(2), 123–129.

4) Claudia, W. M. Y. (2022). The physical education pedagogical approaches in nurturing physical literacy among primary and secondary school students: A scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102080.

5) Croston, A., & Hills, L. A. (2017). The challenges of widening ‘legitimate’understandings of ability within physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(5), 618–634.

6) Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 5(3), 1–13.

7) Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2018). The utilisation of e-learning facilities in the educational delivery system of Nigeria: a study of M-University. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–20.

8) Hills, A. P., Dengel, D. R., & Lubans, D. R. (2015). Supporting public health priorities: recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 57(4), 368–374.

9) Laar, R. A., Ashraf, M. A., Ning, J., Ji, P., Fang, P., Yu, T., & Khan, M. N. (2021). Performance, health, and psychological challenges faced by students of physical education in online learning during COVID-19 epidemic: A qualitative study in China. Healthcare, 9(8), 1030.

10) Méndez-Giménez, A., Carriedo, A., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Cecchini, J.-A. (2023). Self-made material in physical education: Teacher perceptions of the use of an emerging pedagogical model before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Physical Education Review, 29(1), 107–124.

11) Mupa, P., & Chinooneka, T. I. (2015). Factors Contributing to Ineffective Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: Why Are Schools in Decadence?. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 125–132.

12) Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60.

13) Suherman, A., Supriyadi, T., & Cukarso, S. H. I. (2019). Strengthening national character education through physical education: An action research in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 125–153.

14) Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model in the evaluation of training programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 19–183.

15) Ware, P., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Laporte, A., Gordon, K., & Seto, E. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of a mobile phone–based telemonitoring program: longitudinal study guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(7), e10768.

16) Wibowo, Y. G. (2019). Managing sport for healthy lifestyle: A brief review and future research directions. Indonesian Journal of Sport Science and Coaching, 1(2), 57–64.

17) Zach, S., & Rosenblum, H. (2021). The affective domain—a program to foster social-emotional orientation in novice physical education teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7434.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.