1Suwarni Widyowati,2Sumaryanto,3Erwin Setyo Kriswanto,4Hari Yuliarto,5Nurhadi Santoso
1,2,3,4,5Yogyakarta State University, Jl. Colombo Yogyakarta No.1, Karang Malang, DI Yogyakarta, 55283, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i7-01Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to analyze the comparison of Physical Education, Sport and Health (PESH) teacher performance between civil servant and non-civil servant teachers in Kapanewon Godean Sleman. The research method used is quantitative research with a comparative descriptive approach. The research sample consisted of 35 PESH teachers, including 10 civil servant teachers and 25 non-civil servant teachers selected by purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through questionnaires adapted from previous research instruments. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The study shows that there is no significant difference in the performance of Elementary School Physical Education, Sport, and Health (PJOK) teachers who are PNS and non-PNS in six aspects, namely lesson planning (p = 0.369), lesson implementation (p = 0.185), assessment of learning outcomes (p = 0.740), coaching and guidance (p = 0.804), additional tasks (p = 0.402), and professional development (p = 0.492). The p-values for each comparison are greater than the significance value of 0.05. It is concluded that there is no significant difference in the performance of PNS and non-PNS Elementary School PJOK teachers in the six observed aspects, namely lesson planning, lesson implementation, assessment of student learning outcomes, coaching and guidance of students, implementation of additional tasks, and professional development. The implication of this study is the importance of providing support and training to improve the quality of learning and performance of Elementary School PJOK teachers, both PNS and non-PNS.
KEYWORDS:PESH teachers, civil servants, non-civil servants, performance, elementary school
REFERENCES
1) Alqiawi, DA, & Ezzeldin, SM (2015). A Suggested Model for Developing and Assessing Competence of Prospective
Teachers in Faculties of Education. World Journal of Education, 5(6), 65–73.
2) Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers' non-verbal communication on success in teaching.
Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(2), 51.
3) Blazar, D., & Kraft, MA (2016). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students' Attitudes and Behaviors. Educational Evaluation
and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
4) Capel, S., Bassett, S., Lawrence, J., Newton, A., & Zwozdiak-Myers, P. (2018). How trainee physical education teachers in
England write, use and evaluate lesson plans. European Physical Education Review, 25(4), 964–982.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18785053
5) Chan, CKY, Luk, LYY, & Zeng, M. (2014). Teachers' perceptions of student evaluations of teaching. Educational Research
and Evaluation, 20(4), 275–289.
6) Chu, JH, Loyalka, P., Chu, J., Qu, Q., Shi, Y., & Li, G. (2015). The impact of teacher credentials on student achievement in
China. China Economic Review, 36, 14–24.
7) Cowan, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2018). Do bonuses affect teacher staffing and student achievement in high poverty schools?
Evidence from an incentive for national board certified teachers in Washington State. Economics of Education Review,
65, 138–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.06.010
8) Darling-Hammond, L., Newton, SP, & Wei, RC (2013). Developing and assessing beginning teacher effectiveness: The
potential of performance assessments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 179–204.
9) Derri, V., Papamitrou, E., Vernadakis, N., Koufou, N., & Zetou, E. (2014). Early Professional Development of Physical
Education Teachers: Effects on Lesson Planning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 778–783.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.320
10) Dewi, C., Windoro, D., & Pura, DN (2021). Management of Physical Education Facilities and Infrastructure. Journal of
Education Technology, 5(2), 291–297.
11) Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2015). School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil–teacher ratios: Experimental
evidence from Kenyan primary schools. Journal of Public Economics, 123, 92–110.
12) Frasier, USA (2023). Do high school teachers change classroom practice due to evaluation? Evidence from North Carolina's
career status and teacher evaluation policies. Journal of Education Human Resources, aop, e20220007.
13) Fujii, T. (2019). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of lesson study. Theory and Practice of
Lesson Study in Mathematics: An International Perspective, 681–704.
14) Geiger, T., & Pivovarova, M. (2018). The effects of working conditions on teacher retention. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6),
604–625.
15) Hallinger, P., Heck, RH, & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence.
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 5–28.
16) Hammonds, F., Mariano, GJ, Ammons, G., & Chambers, S. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching: improving teaching
quality in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(1), 26–33.
17) Hartini, S., Bhakti, CP, Hartanto, D., & Ghiffari, MAN (2018). Teacher Pedagogic Competency Development Model: A
Literature Review. 5th Asia Pacific Education Conference (AECON 2018), 211–215.
18) Hartiwi, H., Kozlova, AY, & Masitoh, F. (2020). The effect of certified teachers and principal leadership toward teachers'
performance. International Journal of Educational Review, 2(1), 70–88.
19) Indira, EWM, Hermanto, A., & Pramono, SE (2020). Improvement of teacher competence in the industrial revolution era
4.0. International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019), 350–352.
20) Ismail, SAA, & Jarrah, AM (2019). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of Their Pedagogical Preferences, Teaching
Competence and Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 493–510.
21) Jaspers, WM, Meijer, PC, Prins, F., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Mentor teachers: Their perceived possibilities and challenges as
mentors and teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 106–116.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.005
22) Keller, MM, Neumann, K., & Fischer, HE (2017). The impact of physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and
motivation on students' achievements and interests. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614.
23) Kraft, MA, Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-
Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
24) Kusumawardhani, PN (2017). Does the teacher certification program lead to better quality teachers? Evidence from
Indonesia. Education Economics, 25(6), 590–618.
25) Madden, W., Green, S., & Grant, AM (2020). A pilot study evaluating strengths-based coaching for primary school
students: Enhancing engagement and hope. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, 297–312.
26) Margot, KC, & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers' perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review.
International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
27) Mupa, P., & Chinooneka, TI (2015). Factors Contributing to Ineffective Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: Why
Are Schools in Decadence?. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 125–132.
28) Naylor, P.-J., Nettlefold, L., Race, D., Hoy, C., Ashe, MC, Wharf Higgins, J., & McKay, HA (2015). Implementation of school
based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 72, 95–115.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034
29) Noer, MC (2019). The Implementation of Quality Management in a Vocational School. 3rd International Conference on
Education Innovation (ICEI 2019), 187–191.
30) Nurdin, N. (2021). Honorary Teachers in Efforts to Obtain Civil Servant Educator Status. Murhum: Journal of Early
Childhood Education, 10–19.
31) Nzarirwehi, J., & Atuhumuze, F. (2019). In-service teacher training and professional development of primary school
teachers in Uganda. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), 19–36.
32) Osamwonyi, EF (2016). In-Service Education of Teachers: Overview, Problems and the Way Forward. Journal of Education
and Practice, 7(26), 83–87.
33) Papay, JP, & Kraft, MA (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges
and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119.
34) Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., Poom-Valickis, K., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2019). Teacher professional standards to support teacher
quality and learning in Estonia. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 389–399.
35) Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., & Fitria, D. (2018). Academic supervision toward teacher's performance through motivation
as an intervening variable. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(2), 188–197.
36) Rusilowati, U., & Wahyudi, W. (2020). The significance of educator certification in developing pedagogy, personality,
social and professional competencies. 2nd Social and Humanities Research Symposium (SoRes 2019), 446–451.
37) Setyaningsih, S., & Suchyadi, Y. (2021). Implementation Of Principal Academic Supervision To Improve Teacher
Performance In North Bogor. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 5(2), 179–183.
38) Shah, RK (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Shah, RK (2019). Effective Constructivist
Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13.
39) Sumarsono, RB, Kusumaningrum, DE, Gunawan, I., Alfarina, M., Romady, M., Ariyanti, NS, & Budiarti, EM (2019). Training
on the implementation of cooperative learning models as an effort to improve teacher's performance. The 4th
International Conference on Education and Management (COEMA 2019), 259–263.
40) Suryani, A. (2021). “I chose teacher education because...”: a look into Indonesian future teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of
Education, 41(1), 70–88.
41) Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions
and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71–97.
42) Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2016). Innovative teaching units applied to Physical Education–changing the curriculum
management for authentic outcomes. Kinesiology, 48(1.), 142–152.
43) Wahyuddin, W. (2017). Headmaster Leadership and Teacher Competence in Increasing Student Achievement in School.
International Education Studies, 10(3), 215–226.
44) Weber, KE, Gold, B., Prilop, CN, & Kleinknecht, M. (2018). Promoting pre-service teachers' professional vision of classroom
management during practical school training: Effects of a structured online-and video-based self-reflection and feedback
intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 39–49.
45) Wu, Y., & Schunn, CD (2021). From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback
implementation. Instructional Science, 49(3), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5
46) Zhumash, Z., Zhumabaeva, A., Nurgaliyeva, S., Saduakas, G., Lebedeva, LA, & Zhoraeva, SB (2021). Professional Teaching
Competence in Preservice Primary School Teachers: Structure, Criteria and Levels. World Journal on Educational
Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 261–271.
VOLUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 08 Issue 01 (January 2025).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 January 2025 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.