¹Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin,Phd,²Imelda A. Dorado, Lpt

¹Faculty, Institute of Education (IE), Undergraduate Studies, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines

²Master Teacher 1, San Bartolome High School, Quezon City, Philippines

The study aims to investigate the educational progress and prospect theory for teaching pedagogy on the aspect of expected learning outcome, instructional activity, and assessment in teaching and learning. Descriptive quantitative research design is employed in the study because it quantifies and measures the theory being formulated on educational progress and prospects in teaching pedagogy principles. Likewise, convenience sampling is employed in gathering the sample size and population of the study. The study comprised eighty (80) respondents only. Results show that teaching pedagogy principles prioritize effective teaching involvement, focusing on knowledge and skills to determine reason and accomplish an objective learning process, expected learning outcome is based on Specific, Measurable, Attainment, Realistic, and Time-bounded (SMART) which is needed in teaching pedagogy principles, instructional activity shows to help students focus and accomplish the task effectively based on set objective of the lesson, and assessment in teaching and learning shows to design and measure various assessment functions in learning elements as to concept, and level knowledge of students. Findings show that there is a significant relationship on the contribution of educational progress and prospects theory for teaching pedagogy as observed among the respondents.

Educational progress and prospect, teaching pedagogy, teaching principles, expected learning outcome, instructional activity, and assessment in teaching and learning

1) Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is Empathy the Key to Effective Teaching? A Systematic Review of Its Association with Teacher-Student Interactions and Student Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 1-40.

2) Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections among students’ engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21.

3) Balakrishnan, B. (2022). Exploring the impact of design thinking tools among design undergraduates: a study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1799-1812.

4) Chen, J., & Cheng, T. (2022). Review of research on teacher emotion during 1985–2019: a descriptive quantitative analysis of knowledge production trends. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(2), 417-438.

5) Darling-Hammond, L., Wechsler, M. E., Levin, S., & Tozer, S. (2022). Developing Effective Principals: What Kind of Learning Matters?. Learning Policy Institute.

6) Guo, J. P., Yang, L. Y., Zhang, J., & Gan, Y. J. (2022). Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: relationships and causal ordering. Higher Education, 83(4), 809-828.

7) HR, G., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). Deriving Right Sample Size and Choosing an Appropriate Sampling Technique to Select Samples from the Research Population During Ph. D. Program in India. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 6(2), 288-306.

8) James, M., Baptista, A. M. T., Barnabas, D., Sadza, A., Smith, S., Usmani, O., & John, C. (2022). Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: a novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students. BMC medical education, 22(1), 1-12.

9) Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bossu, C., Charitonos, K., Coughlan, T., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., ... & Whitelock, D. (2022). Innovating pedagogy 2022: exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers.

10) Li, Q. K., Wollny, K., Twilt, M., Walsh, C. M., Bright, K., Dimitropoulos, G., ... & Tomfohr-Madsen, L. (2022). Curricula, teaching methods, and success metrics of clinician–scientist training programs: a scoping review. Academic Medicine, 97(9), 1403-1412.

11) Mallillin, L. L. D. (2020). Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students. Journal of Educational System, 4(1), 1-11.

12) Mallillin, L. L. D. (2021). Teacher Theory and Adaptable Model: An Application to Teaching Profession. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12).

13) Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(2), 99-121.

14) Mallillin, L. L. D., Cabaluna, J. C., Laurel, R. D., Arroyo, P. A. C., Señoron Jr, T. M., & Mallillin, J. B. (2021). Structural domain of learning and teaching strategies in the academic performance of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9).

15) Mallillin, L. L. D., Carag, E. A., Mallillin, J. B., & Laurel, R. D. (2020). Integration of knowledge through online classes in the learning enhancement of students. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(1).

16) Mallillin, L. L. D., & Laurel, R. D. (2022). Professional Development System Theory for Quality Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(8).

17) Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies.

18) Mallillin, L. L. D., Mendoza, L. C., Mallillin, J. B., Felix, R. C., & Lipayon, I. C. (2020). Implementation and readiness of online learning pedagogy: a transition to COVID 19 pandemic. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(2).

19) Morales-Belando, M. T., Kirk, D., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2022). A systematic review of teaching games for understanding intervention studies from a practice-referenced perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(4), 670-681.

20) O’Brien, S., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & Brown, M. (2022). Learning by doing: Evaluating the key features of a professional development intervention for teachers in data-use, as part of whole school self-evaluation process. Professional Development in Education, 48(2), 273-297.

21) Okolie, U. C., Igwe, P. A., Mong, I. K., Nwosu, H. E., Kanu, C., & Ojemuyide, C. C. (2022). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1184-1198.

22) Rahman, M. A., Melliyani, M., Handrianto, C., Erma, E., & Rasool, S. (2022). Prospect and promise in integrating multiliteracy pedagogy in the english language classroom in indonesia. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 8(1), 34-52.

23) Reynolds, W. M., & Park, S. (2021). Examining the relationship between the Educative Teacher Performance Assessment and preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 721-748.

24) Risan, M. (2022). Negotiating professional expertise: Hybrid educators’ boundary work in the context of higher education-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103559.

25) Sabah, N. M. (2022). The Impact of Social Media-Based Collaborative Learning Environments on Students’ Use Outcomes in Higher Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-23.

26) Soltura, R. T. (2022). Designing a constructivist learning aid module in disentangling least mastered competencies in the wave motion. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 1-18.

27) Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Vargas-González, O. C. (2022). Strategies for meaningful learning in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 47-64.

28) Yan, L., Martinez‐Maldonado, R., Zhao, L., Dix, S., Jaggard, H., Wotherspoon, R., ... & Gašević, D. (2022). The role of indoor positioning analytics in assessment of simulation‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.