¹Putu Riska Wulandari,²Ida Ayu Nyoman Saskara,³I.G.W Murjana Yasa,⁴A.A. Istri Ngurah Marhaeni

^1,2,3,4Faculty of Economic and Business, Udayana University, Indonesia

Due to subak's socio-agrarian, religious, economic, dynamic, and independent qualities, agriculture and subak are intimately intertwined in Bali. The existence of subak and the viability of Bali's agriculture may be threatened by both internal agricultural issues and global changes. This study intends to investigate the institutional aspects of subak agricultural sustainability in Denpasar City. The majority of the land is farmed by sharecroppers or smallholders, making the use of restricted land in urban farming a problem for sustainable urban agriculture. The research technique employed is the literature review method, which uses a variety of pertinent scientific journals, particularly those on sustainable urban agriculture, to gather the information needed for the study. The findings of this study suggest that institutional factors are crucial for preserving subak's viability and fostering subak farming in urban settings. Social capital is the factor that contributes most to the sustainability of urban farming in Denpasar City. In conjunction with Tri Hita Karana, who continues to play the function of the Subak in agriculture in the City of Denpasar, the support of social capital in institutions fosters a high level of community involvement.

Institutional factor; Subak; Sustainable Development

1) Arnawa, I.K. 2011. Kajian Tentang Pelestarian Subak ditinjau dari Aktivitasnya yang Berlandasarn Konsep Tri Hita Karana. Jurnal Agrimeta Vol 1(1)

2) Chakim, Muhammad Lutfil; Rifin, Amzul; Sanim, Bunasor. 2019. Pengaruh Implementasi Kartu Tani terhadap Efektivitas Penyaluran Pupuk Bersubsidi di Kabupaten Kendal, Jawa Tengan. PANGAN: Volume 28, No, 3 Desember 2019.

3) Darmadi, Hamid. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

4) Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review. Journal of criminal justice education, 24(2), 218-234.

5) Esty, Daniel C, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, De Sherbinin A. 2005. Environmental Sustainability Index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven-USA : Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.

6) Khan, Nisar and Saghir Ahmad Ansari. 2008. Application of New Institutional Economics to the Problems of Development: A Survey, Abstracct Journal of Economics Sosial and Economics Development 10 (1)

7) Lanya, I., Subadiyasa, N.N., Sardiana, K., Ratna Adi, G.,P. 2015. Numerical Classification, Subak Zoning and Land Transfer Function Rice Field in Province of Bali Based on Remote Sensing and GIS. Procedia: Enviromental Sciences. Vol. 24 pp.47-55.

8) Linda, Anggreni Madik; AMbarwati, IGAA dan Ustriyana, I Nyoman Gede. 2018. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, Vol 6 No 1 2018.

9) Notohadiprawiro, T., Soekodarmodjo, S.dan Sukana, E. 2006. Pengelolaan Kesuburan Tanah dan Peningkatan Efisiensi Pemupukan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. 01-19hal.

10) Prastyadewi, MI, Susilowati, Indah, Iskandar, Dinar. 2020. Preserving the existence of Subak in Bali: the role of social, cultural, and economic agencies. Economia Agro-Alimentare Food Economics. 2020. Vol 22 Issue 3

11) SEARCA, 1995. Working Paper on Sustainable Agriculture Indicators. SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA). College, Laguna 4031, Philippines.

12) Susilowati, I., Mardiana, I., & Mukson, M. (2020). WILLINGNESS TO PAY UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN FASILITAS AGROWISATA 172 KECAMATAN BANDUNGAN KABUPATEN SEMARANG (Studi kasus di Setiya Aji Flower Farm). Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 4(2), 289-297.

13) Sutawan, N. 2005. Subak Menghadapi Tantangan Globalisasi. Dalam Pitana dan Setiawan AP. editor.. Revitalisasi Subak dalam Memasuki Era Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

14) Sutawan, Nyoman, Eksistensi Subak di Bali: Mampukah Subak bertahan menghadapi berbagai tantangan, Program, Studiv Ekonomi Pertanian, fakultas pertanian universitas udayana, :https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/43837-ID-eksistensi-subak-di-bali-mampukah-bertahan-menghadapai-berbagai-tantangan.pdf

15) Syahyuti. 2007. Kebijakan Pengembangan Gabungan Kelompok Tani (Gapoktan) Sebagai Kelembagaan Ekonomi di Pedesaan. Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, Bogor

16) Tamaratika, Fenilia dan Rosyidie, Arief. 2017. Inkorporasi Kearifan Lokal Dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Pariwisata Di Lingkungan Pantai. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, Vol. 16, No 1, April 2017.

17) UU No. 12/1992 tentang Sistem Budidaya Tanaman yang salah satu pasalnya menyebutkan bahwa petani diberikan kewenangan menentukan jenis tanaman yang diusahakan.

18) Wells, V. K., Smith, D. G., Taheri, B., Manika, D., & McCowlen, C. (2016). An exploration of CSR development in heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 1-17.

19) Windia, Wayan. 2013. Penguatan Budaya Subak Melalui Pemberdayaan Petani. Jurnal Kajian Bali, Volume 03 Nomor 02 Oktober 2013.

20) Windia, W. et al. (2005) ‘Tri Hita Karana ( THK ) Sebagai Teknologi Sepadan Dalam Pertanian’, SOCA (Socio-Economic of Agriculturre and Agribusiness), 5(3). Available at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/soca/article/view/4095.

21) Wiyatna, Putu Novarisna; Julianti, Lis. 2015. Penguatan awig-awig subak untuk mencegah alih fungsi lahan pertanian di kawasan pesisir pantai di kabupaten buleleng http://lppm.unmas.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/06/11-Putu-Wiyatna-KL1.pdf , diakses, 11-11-2017.

22) Wuepper, D. (2017). What is the value of world heritage status for a German national park? A choice experiment from Jasmund, 1 year after inscription. Tourism Economics, 23(5), 1114-1123. 173

23) Xavier Font & Jennifer Lynes (2018) Corporate social responsibility in tourism and hospitality, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26:7, 1027- 1042, DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1488856 Yasar, M., Siwar, C., Firdaus, R.B.R., 2016. Assessing paddy farming sustainability in the Northern Terengganu Integrated Agricultural Development Area (IADA KETARA): A structural equation modelling approach. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol.1 (2), pp 71- 75.

24) Yuliarmi, Ni Nyhoman, Dunggio Maryam, Yasa Mahaendra, I Nyoman (2020). Improving Public Welfare Through Strengthening Social Capital and Coorperative Empowerment. Cogent Business & Manajement.

25) Yustika, Ahmad Erani. 2012. Ekonomi Kelembagaan Paradigma, Teori dan Kebijakan. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga

26) Yustika, A. E., & Baksh, R. (2015). Konsep Ekonomi Kelembagaan Perdesaan, Pertanian, dan Kedaulatan Pangan. Empat Dua. Malang.

27) Zhong, L., Deng, J., Song, Z., & Ding, P. (2011). Research on environmental impacts of tourism in China: Progress and prospect. Journal of environmental management, 92(11), 2972-2983.

28) Zuraida, D dan J. Rizal (ed), 1993. Masyarakat dan Manusia dalam Pembangunan : Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Selo Soemardjan. Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Jakarta

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.