¹Mustika Al Fatikhah, ²Sumaryanti, ³Amri Hartanto, ⁴Betrix Teofa Perkasa Wibafiet Billy Yachsie,
⁵Andrian Rahman Ayudi, ⁶Afeb Chesa Arianto,⁷ Ujang Nurdin

^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7}Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta Indonesia

This study aims to determine the results of the evaluation of context, input, process, product implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City. The results showed that the evaluation of the implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City resulted in the poor category. Furthermore, each evaluation aspect is explained, namely. (1) The context of the evaluation of the implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City was categorized as good. Indicators of learning materials and the formulation of objectives are 3.14 in the good category, organizing materials, media, and other learning resources are 2.78 in the good category, designing teaching and learning activities are 3.34 in the very good category, class management is 3.33 in the very good category, and an assessment of 3.35 in the very good category. (2) The input for the evaluation of the implementation of the evaluation of the implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City was good. The indicator of the suitability of learning materials with KI KD is 3.29 in the good category and the characteristics of students are 2.41 in the less. (3) The process of evaluating the implementation of the evaluation of the implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City resulted in the poor category. The learning activity indicator is 2.30 in the less category and the student activities are 1.86 in the less category. (4) Product evaluation of the evaluation program for the implementation of adaptive physical education learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at Special Schools in Yogyakarta City the results were in the less category. The indicator of achievement learning outcomes in Special Schools in Yogyakarta City is 1.83 in the less category.

Evaluation, Adaptive Physical Education, Covid-19 Pandemic

1) Abd Ulhussein, MA, & Abd Ali, NH (2021). A comparative study in some teaching skills between male and female teachers of physical education in the Governorate of Babylon. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 11144-11154.

2) Adedoyin, OB, & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.

3) Afudaniati, AR, Hidayatullah, MF, & Andayani, TR (2021, March). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of adaptive physical education learning in SLB. In CoMBInES-Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences, 1(1) 258-263.

4) Agarwal, S., & Kaushik, JS (2020). Student's perception of online learning during the COVID pandemic. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), 554-554.

5) Ahmed, R. (2018). Effects of online education on encoding and decoding process of students and teachers. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 3(4).

6) Aini, HQ, & Tresnawati, D. (2019). The design of interactive learning media for autistic children in extraordinary schools. Journal of Algorithms, 16(1), 51-57.

7) Akimov, A., & Malin, M. (2020). When old becomes new: A case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1205-1221.

8) Alalwan, AA, Baabdullah, AM, Rana, NP, Tamilmani, K., & Dwivedi, YK (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 55, 100-110.

9) Alamim, K. (2020). Inclusion programs for students who are deaf and hard of hearing in Saudi Arabia: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(6), 571-591.

10) Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2), 104-116.

11) Anjani, A., Ratnamulyani, IA, & Kusumadinata, AA (2018). The use of whatsapp communication media on the effectiveness of employee performance. Journal of Communication, 4(1).

12) Annamalai, N. (2019). Using whatsapp to extend learning in a blended classroom environment. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 3-20.

13) Anugrahana, A. (2020). Barriers, solutions and hopes: online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic by primary school teachers. Scholaria: Journal of Education and Culture, 10(3), 282-289.

14) Baharun, H., & Awwaliyah, R. (2018). Inclusive education for children with special needs in the perspective of Islamic epistemology. MODELING: Journal of the PGMI Study Program, 5(1), 57-71.

15) Bal, IA, Arslan, O., Budhrani, K., Mao, Z., Novak, K., & Muljana, PS (2020). The balance of roles: Graduate student perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic. TechTrends, 64(6), 796-798.

16) Bamu, BN, De Schauwer, E., Verstraete, S., & Van Hove, G. (2017). Inclusive education for students with hearing impairment in the regular secondary schools in the North-West region of Cameroon: Initiatives and challenges. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(6), 612-623.

17) Barattucci, M. (2017). Approach to study as an indicator of the quality of teaching and of learning environment: The contribution of John Biggs. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2).

18) Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, HD, & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2).

19) Braisilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1–9.

20) Budi Lestari, AS, Nusantara, T., Chandra, TD, & Indrawatiningsih, N. (2021). Covid-19: The effects of distance learning in Indonesia based on a commognitive perspective. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(3).

21) Budiman, J. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of online learning in Indonesia during the Covid-19 pandemic. VOX EDUKASI: Scientific Journal of Education, 12(1), 104-113.

22) Epstein, JL (2019). Theory to practice: School and family partnerships lead to school improvement and student success. In School, Family and Community Interaction (pp. 39-52). Routledge.

23) Frye, AW, & Hemmer, PA (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical Teacher: An International Journal of Education in the Health Science, 34(5), 288-299.

24) García-Peñalvo, FJ, Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the covid-19 pandemic. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context (pp. 85-98). Springer, Singapore.

25) Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers' work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(4).

Volume 05 Issue 02 February 2022