• editor@ijmra.in
  • ISSN[Online] : 2643-9875  ||  ISSN[Print] : 2643-9840

Volume 05 Issue 10 October 2022

Lipid Profile in Metabolic Syndrome Associated with Diabetes, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease and Apparent Health
1Ogbu, Innocent S.I; Ph.D,2Ogbu Chinemerem C.; B.MLS,3Ndukwe, Mbrey; MSc,4Agunwah, Elizabeth; MSc, 5Eze, Clementina MSc,6Okeke, Nduka J; FMC.Path
1,2,3Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Evangel University. Akaeze. Ebonyi State. Nigeria
4Department of Nursing Sciences. Evangel University. Akaeze. Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
5School of Basic Midwifery, Alex Ekwueme Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki. Ebonyi State.
1,6Department of Chemical Pahology. Faculty of Clinical Medicine. Ebonyi State University. Abakalilki, Ebonyi State. Nigeria.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i10-42

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

Background: There is dyslipidaemia in metabolic syndrome (MetS). Lipid profiles in MetS associated with different health conditions may not be obvious. This study investigated lipid profiles in MetS associated with type 2 diabetes (DM-MetS), hypertension (HBP-MetS), chronic kidney disease (CKD-MetS) and apparent health (AH-MetS).

Methods: 540 patients were recruited for this study; 183 T2D, 136 HBP, 84 CKD patients and 137 AH subjects. They were outpatients and workers in the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu. Nigeria. FPG, TC, HDL-C, TG as well as anthropometric measurements were determined using standard methods. Data analyses were done using GraphPad Prism version 2 statistical programme. MetS was diagnosed using NCEP-ATP 111 criteria

Results: Study showed 135 DM, 64 HBP, 31 CKD and 52 AH subjects had MetS, (prevalence rates: 36.9 %, 14.7 %, 18.4 %, and 37.9 % respectively). Only 38% MetS subjects had hypertriglyceridaemia while 66% with hypertriglyceridaemia had MetS. Corresponding figures for low HDLC were 40, and 77%. CKD-MetS had higher mean value of TG and TC than others; (2.65 ± 0.16 mmol/l; F = 11.4; P =0.0001; 6.07±0.02mmol/l; p = 0.001). Variations in TC were observed across groups, (p =0.0001). HDL-C was highest in AH-MetS, (1.51 ±0.07 mmol/l) and differed with mean value of DM-MetS, (1.23 ± 0.04mmol/l, p=0.01) only. Following the pattern of TC, LDLC was lowest among DM-MetS, (2.75 ± 0.06 mmol/l) and highest among CKD-MetS, (3.65 ± 0.28 mmol/l, p =0.001) with variations across groups, (F = 6.35; p= 0.0004).

Conclusion: Dyslipidemia profile varied with associated disorders. Presence of MetS is not a strong factor for development of lipid disorders in the study population.

KEYWORDS:

metabolic syndrome, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, lipid profile

REFERENCES

1) Reilly MP, Rader DJ. The metabolic syndrome: more than the sum of its parts?

2) Circulation 2003; 108:1546–51.

3) Ayyobi AF, Brunzell JD. Lipoprotein distribution in the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and familial combined hyperlipidemia. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:27–33J.

4) De-Fronzo, R.A; Frrrannim, E; (1991). Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 14 (3): 173 – 174.

5) Balkau, B; Charles, M.A; (1999). Comments on the provisional report from the WHO Consultation. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance, (EGIR). Diab Med 16(3): 442 – 443.

6) National Cholesterol Education Programme. 3rd Report of the NCEP on Detection and treatment of high blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel 111): final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143 -3421.

7) Flegal, K.M; Caroll, M.D; Ogden, C.L; Johnson, C.L. Prevalence and trend in obesity among US adults 1999-2000. JAMA (2002); 288: 1723 – 1727.

8) Alexander, C.M; Landsman, T.B; Teutsh, S.M; Haffner, S.M;. National Cholesterol Education Programme, (NCEP) – defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes and prevalence of coronary heart disease among National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, (NHANES) 111 participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes (2003); 52 (8): 1210 – 1214.

9) Kaplan, N.M; (1989). The deadly quartet: upper body adiposity, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridaemia and hypertension. Arch Intern Med 149: 1514 – 1520.

10) Stamler, J; Stamler, A; Neaon, J.D; (1993). Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic and cardiovascular risk; US Population Data. Arch Intern Med 153: 598 – 615.

11) World Health Organization (1999). Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabtes mellitus. Geneva, WHO department of Non-Communicable disease Surveillance

12) Mykkanen, L; Kuusisto, J; Pyoralas, K; Laakso, M; (1993). Cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus in the elderly subjects. Diabetologia 36: 553 – 559.

13) Alexander, C.M; Landsman, T.B; Teutsh, S.M; Haffner, S.M; (2003). National Cholesterol Education Programme, (NCEP) – defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes and prevalence of coronary heart disease among National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, (NHANES) 111 participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes 52 (8): 1210 – 1214.

14) Summer, S.A; & Nelson, D.H; (2005). A role for sphingolipids in producing the common features of type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome X and Cushing’s syndrome. Diabetes 53(30: 591- 602.

15) Sophia S.K, Yu, Darleen C Casttilo, Amber B Courville, Anne E Summer. The Triglyceride Paradox in people of African descent. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. (2012);10(2): 77 – 82

16) Meigs, J.B; D’Agostino, R.B.S; Wilson, P.W; Gupples, L.A; Nathan, D.M; Singer, D.E; (1977). Risk variable clustering in the insulin resistance syndrome: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes 46 (10): 1594 – 1600.

17) Gray, R.S; Fabsitz, R.R; Cowan, L.D; Lee, E.T; Howard, B.V; Savage, P.J; (1998). Risk factor clustering in the insulin resistance syndrome: The Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 148:869 – 878.

18) Chen, W; Srinivasan, S.R; Elkasabany, A; Berenson, G.S; (1999). Cardiovascular risk factor clustering features of insulin resistance syndrome, (Syndrome X) in a biracial (blck-white) population of children, adolescents and young adults: The Bogahisa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 150: 667 – 674.

19) Sakkinen, PA, Wahl, P, Cushman, M, Lewis, MR, Tracy, RP, (2001). Clustering of procoagulation, inflammation and fibrinolysis variables with metabolic factor in insulin resistance syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 152: 897 – 907.

20) Mykkanen, L; Kuusisto, J; Pyoralas, K; Laakso, M; (1993). Cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus in the elderly subjects. Diabetologia 36: 553 – 559.

21) Dacie, J.V; Lewis, S.M; (1975). Practical Haematology. 5th Edition ELBS and Churchill Livingstone. P. 1-20

22) Friedewald, W.T; Levy, R. I; Fredrickson, D.S. Estimation of the concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol without the use of the preparatory ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem . (1972);18: 499-502

23) Buccolo, G; David, H. Quatitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem (1973); 19(4): 476 – 482.

24) .Allain, C.C; Poon, L.S; Clau, C.G.S; Richmond, W; Fu, P.D. Enzymatic determination of total cholesterol. Clin Chem (1974); 20(3): 470 – 475.

25) National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP).Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in adults, (Adult Treatment Panel 111) final report. Circulation (2002); 106 (25): 3143 – 3421.

26) Dows, J.R. Clerafeld, M. Weiss, S. Whitney, E. Shapiro, D.R. Beere, P.A. Langendorf, A. Stein,

27) Libby, P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndrome. Circulation (2001); 104 (3): 365 – 372.

28) Krentz, A.J. Lipoprotien abnormalities and their consequences for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diab Obes Metab (2003); 5: 519 – 527.

29) Choi SH and Ginsberg HN. Increased very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion, hepatic steatosis, and insulin resistance. Trends in Endocrinol Metab. 22:353-363

30) Pedroza-Tobias, A., Trejo-Valdivia, B., Sanchez-Romero, L.M. et al. Classification of metabolic syndrome according to lipid alterations: analysis from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006. BMC Public Health (2014); 14, 1056

31) Jeppesen, J; Hein, H.O; Saudicani, P; Cyntelberg, F. High triglyceride and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure and risk of ischaemic heart disease. Hypertension (2000); 36: 226 – 229.

32) Mazza A, Tikhonoff V, Schiavon L, Casiglia E: Triglycerides + high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol dyslipidaemia, a coronary risk factor in elderly women: the CArdiovascular Study in the ELderly. Intern Med J. (2005); 35 (10): 604-610.

33) McLaughlin T, Reaven G, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Saad M, Waters D, Simon J, Krauss RM: Is there a simple Way to identify insulin-resistant individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease?. Am J Cardiol. (2005); 96: 399-404

34) McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Cheal K, Chu J, Lamendola C, Reaven G: Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant. Ann Intern Med. (2003); 139 (10): 802-809.

35) Giannini E. Testa R. The metabolic syndrome: All criteria are equal, but some criteria are more equal than others. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163:2787–2788.

36) Osei K. Metabolic syndrome in blacks: Are the criteria right? Curr Diab Rep. 2010; 10:199–208.

37) Sumner AE. Zhou J. Doumatey A, et al. Low HDL-cholesterol with normal triglyceride levels is the most common lipid pattern in West Africans and African Americans with metabolic syndrome: Implications for cardiovascular disease prevention. CVD Prev Control. 2010; 5:75–80.

38) Ervin RB. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003–2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009:1–7.

39) Park YW. Zhu S. Palaniappan L, et al. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163:427–436.

Volume 05 Issue 10 October 2022

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Our Services and Policies

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.

The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.

Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).

PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online

Why with us

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis is better then other journals because:-
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.

The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

Indexed In
Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar