¹Muhammad Habibbulloh, ²Silvi Rosiva Rosdiana, ³Agus Santoso, ⁴Khoiro Mahbubah

¹Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia

^2,3,4 Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Trainer and Education, Islamic University of Lamongan, Indonesia

This study aims to determine the validity of student worksheet for Junior High School (JHS) in chapter dynamic electricity based on virtual laboratory as a companion for science learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Worksheet is designed to enhance the critical thinking skills of students. It is validated by 3 expert validators from 3 leading universities in Indonesia. The instrument used to assess the format, language, content, and effectiveness of student worksheets in an effort to improve students' critical thinking skills. The data analysed by descriptive and quantitative. The results of the expert validator's assessment showed that the percentage of agreement of the student worksheet in the Format, Language and Content category also critical thinking assessment was “Valid”. These means that student worksheet in chapter dynamic electricity based on virtual laboratory can be used with minor revision. The level of originality of the student worksheet is very high with parameter no penalty (NP). The conclusion from the research, the dynamic electricity worksheets developed have a high percentage of agreement and originality so that they can be used to accompany science learning during the pandemic to enhance students' critical thinking skills.

Student Worksheet, Dynamic Electricity, Virtual Laboratory

1) Athaillah, Ibn Khaldun, Mursal. (2017). Improved Understanding of Student Concepts through Virtual Laboratories on Dynamic Electrical Material at SMA Negeri 1 Sukamakmur Aceh Besar. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, Vol. 05, No.01, pp. 114-119, 2017

2) Barry, C. & Gerstman, J. (2015). Testing the potential for improving student mastery of complex financial concepts online. International Journal of Technologies in Learning.

3) Cicyn, Riantoni & Astalini, Astalini & Darmaji, Darmaji. (2019). Study of the use of PhET Interactive Simulations in physics learning. Journal of Research and Physical Education Studies. 6.11.10.2928 / jrkpf.v6i2.14202.

4) Fencl, J. (2013). Using PhET Simulations in the Physics First Classroom: An Alternative to Traditional Laboratories and Teaching Style. Master Paper of Science in Education-Physic. University of Wisconsin River Falls.

5) Finkelstein, N., W. adams, C. Keller, K. Perkins & C. Wieman. (2006). HighTeach Tool for Teaching Physich: the Physics Education Technology Project.

6) Habibbulloh M. (2019). Effectiveness of The Guided Discovery Model Based Virtual Lab PhET Toward Mastery Students’ Concept on Topic Photoelectric Effect. Science Education and Application Journal 1 (1), 1-9

7) Halgamuge, Malka. (2017). the use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 10.1002/cae.21842.

8) Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking (5th Ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

9) Hayes, John & Hatch, Jill. (1999). Issues in Measuring Reliability: Correlation Versus Percentage of Agreement. Written Communication - WRIT COMMUN. 16. 354-367.10.1177/0741088399016003004.

10) Hendri, Silviana & Faradhillah, Faradhillah. (2020). Pengembangan LKS Inkuiri Materi Listrik Dinamis. IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education. 2. 1. 10.29300/ijisedu.v2i1.2670.

11) Ibrahim, Muslim. (2005). Continuous Assessment. Surabaya: Unipress, State University of Surabaya

12) Khairunnisak. (2018). Improved Concept Understanding and Student Motivation through Physic Education Technology (PhET) Simulation. Journal of Science Education Research (JPPIPA) P-ISSN: 2460-2582 | E-ISSN: 2407-795X.

13) Lewin, Lewis & Wakefield, James. (1979). Percentage agreement and phi: A conversion table. Journal of applied behavior analysis. 12. 299-301. 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-299.

14) Li, Jinrong & Li, Mimi. (2018). Turnitin and peer review in ESL academic writing classrooms. Language, Learning and Technology.

15) Linn, Robert. (2020). Educational measurement (3rd ed.). The American Council on Education/Macmillan series on higher education.

16) Martin, Florence & Polly, Drew & Ritzhaupt, Albert. (2020). Bichronous Online Learning: Blending Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.

17) Moro, Christian & Kinash, Shelley. (2013). Developing online worksheets that work. Education Technology Solutions Edition: 52Chapter: 1Publisher: Australian Media Group Editors: John Bigelow

18) Nisa, E. K., Koestiari, T., Habibbulloh, M., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of guided inquiry learning model to improve students’ critical thinking skills at senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1).

19) Ratumanan, G.T. & Laurens, T. (2011). Learning Outcomes Assessment in Education Unit Level. Surabaya: Unipress, State University of Surabaya.

20) Rhim, Hye Chang & Han, Heeyoung. (2020). Teaching online: foundational concepts of online learning and practical guidelines. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 32. 175-183.

21) Sinaga, Steven. (2018). Use of the Turnitin Application as a Means to Check Plagiarism in the Ukrida University Library Service. BIBLIOTIKA: Journal of Library and Information Studies. 2. 123-131. 10.17977 / um008v2i22018p123.

22) Sugiyono. (2011). Using PhET and Simple KIT for Senior High Schools Subject of Optical Tools to Improve Process and Cooperative Learning Skills. Thesis. Surabaya: Graduate School of Surabaya State University

23) Thiagarajan S, Semmel DS, dan Semmel MI. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington.

24) Tiruneh, Dawit Tibebu & De Cock, Mieke & G. Weldeslassie, Ataklti & Elen, Jan & Janssen, Rianne. (2016). Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 15. 10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0.

25) Villar-Mayuntupa, Gustavo. (2020). Using Turnitin to boost the originality in the elaboration of argumentative essays among Peruvian university students.1-4.10.1109/EDUNINE48860.2020.9149492.

Volume 05 Issue 01 January 2022