• editor@ijmra.in
  • ISSN[Online] : 2643-9875  ||  ISSN[Print] : 2643-9840

Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024

Multilevel Environmental Governance in Indonesia: Analysis of Implementation Pathways and Institutional Dynamics
1Pranyoto, 2Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti, 3Soenyono, 4Edi Suhardono
1,2,3,4Universitas Hang Tuah, Jalan Arif Rahman No. 150, Surabaya, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i10-46

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

This study examines Indonesia's environmental governance framework, focusing on the complex interplay between global environmental imperatives and local implementation challenges. Through a qualitative analytical approach utilizing comprehensive secondary data, the research investigates how Indonesia navigates environmental governance while balancing economic development priorities. The study analyzes the integration of traditional ecological knowledge with modern environmental management approaches and examines the effectiveness of adaptive governance mechanisms in addressing diverse environmental challenges. The findings reveal that Indonesia's multilevel governance system, while facing coordination challenges, demonstrates significant potential in developing comprehensive environmental frameworks. The research highlights the critical role of institutional capacity building and stakeholder engagement in environmental governance, particularly in balancing economic development with environmental protection. The study also identifies key challenges in implementing environmental policies across Indonesia's diverse archipelagic territory, including intergovernmental coordination issues and resource allocation barriers. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the importance of context-specific approaches in environmental governance, particularly in integrating traditional knowledge systems with modern environmental management practices. This study contributes to the broader understanding of environmental governance in developing nations and provides valuable insights for policymakers seeking to enhance environmental governance effectiveness while maintaining sustainable development objectives.

KEYWORDS:

Environmental Policy Implementation, Local-Global Governance Interface, Adaptive Environmental Management Stakeholder Coordination,Ecological Knowledge Integration

REFERENCES
1) Agrawal, A., Brandhorst, S., Jain, M., Liao, C., Pradhan, N., & Solomon, D. (2022). From environmental governance to governance for sustainability. One Earth, 5(6), 615–621.

2) Ali, S. H., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2018). Pollution and economic development: An empirical research review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 123003.

3) Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114.

4) Campagnolo, L., & Davide, M. (2019). Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of cli- mate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality. World Development, 122, 96–109.

5) Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952.

6) Chen, L., & Xie, M. (2023). How do hard regimes absorb, overlap, and squeeze out soft regimes? Insights from global carbon markets. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00064-3

7) Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912

8) Dimitrov, R. S. (2020). Empty institutions in global environmental politics. International Studies Review, 22(3), 626–650.

9) Glemarec, Y., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2012). The role of the visible hand of public institutions in creat- ing a sustainable future. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 200–214.

10) Grip, K. (2017). International marine environmental governance: A review. Ambio, 46(4), 413–427.

11) Guttman, D., Young, O., Jing, Y., Bramble, B., Bu, M., Chen, C., Furst, K., Hu, T., Li, Y., Logan, K., Liu, L.,Price, L., Spencer, M., Suh, S., Sun, X., Tan, B., Wang, H., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Zeidan, R. (2018). Environmental governance in China: Interactions between the state and “nonstate actors.” Journal of Environmental Management, 220, 126–135.

12) Hale, T. (2020). Transnational actors and transnational governance in global environmental politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 203–220.

13) Jabbour, J., &Flachsland, C. (2017). 40 years of global environmental assessments: A retrospective analysis.

14) Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 193–202.

15) Laurent, É., Galli, A., Battaglia, F., Dalla Libera Marchiori, G., & Fioramonti, L. (2022). Toward health- environment policy: Beyond the Rome declaration. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102418.

16) Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297–325.

17) Li, W., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2021). Environmental governance for sustainable development in Asia. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112622.

18) Liu, Y., Dong, L., & Fang, M. (2023). Advancing ‘Net Zero Competition’ in Asia-Pacific under a dynamic era: A comparative study on the carbon neutrality policy toolkit in Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00065-2.

19) Macedo, L., Jacobi, P. & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2023). Paradiplomacy of cities in the global south and multilevel climate governance: Evidence from Brazil. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00060-7.

20) Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.

21) Mitchell, R. B., Andonova, L. B., Axelrod, M., Balsiger, J., Bernauer, T., Green, J. F., Hollway, J., Kim, R. E., & Morin, J.-F. (2020). What we know (and could know) about international environmental agree- ments. Global Environmental Politics, 20(1), 103–121.

22) Mumtaz, M. (2023). Intergovernmental relations in climate change governance: A Pakistani case. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00066-1. O’Neill, K., Weinthal, E., Marion Suiseeya, K. R., Bernstein, S., Cohn, A., Stone, M. W., &Cashore, B. (2013). Methods and global environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38(1), 441–471.

23) Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.

24) Picavet, M. E. B., de Macedo, L. S., Bellezoni, R. A., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2023). How can trans- national municipal networks foster local collaborative governance regimes for environmental manage- ment? Environmental Management, 71, 505–522.

25) Pinto, R. F., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2008). Implementation challenges in protecting the global environ- mental commons: The case of climate change policies in Brazil. Public Administration and Develop- ment, 28(5), 340–350.

26) Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2005). Enforcing protected area guidelines in Brazil: What explains participation in the implementation process? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(4), 420–436.

27) Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2019). Intergovernmental relations for environmental governance: Cases of solid waste management and climate change in two Malaysian States. Journal of Environmental Man- agement, 233, 481–488.

28) Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Jing, Y., & Collins, P. (2015). Public administration for development: Trends and the way forward. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 65–72.

29) Qian, H., Qi, J., &Gao, X. (2023). What determines international climate finance? Payment capability, self- interests and political commitment. Global Public Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00062-5.

30) Rodela, R., &GergerSwartling, Å. (2019). Environmental governance in an increasingly complex world: Reflections on transdisciplinary collaborations for knowledge coproduction and learning. Environmen- tal Policy and Governance, 29(2), 83–86.

31) Singh, G. G., Oduber, M., Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., &Ridderstaat, J. (2021). Aiding ocean develop- ment planning with SDG relationships in Small Island Developing States. Nature Sustainability, 4(7), 7.

32) Ulibarri, N., Imperial, M. T., Siddiki, S., & Henderson, H. (2023). Drivers and dynamics of collaborative governance in environmental management. Environmental Management, 71(3), 495–504.

33) Xu, L., Zhao, X., & Chen, J. (2022). Exploring the governance dilemma of nuclear wastewater in Fukushima: A tripartite evolutionary game model. Ocean & Coastal Management, 225, 106220.

34) Young, O. R. (2021). Can practitioners and analysts join forces to address largescale environmental chal- lenges? Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(1), 61–77.

35) Zagrebelnaya, N. S. (2022). Environmental aspects of arctic development. In E. V. Pak, A. I. Krivtsov, & N.S. Zagrebelnaya (Eds.), The handbook of the arctic: A broad and comprehensive overview (pp. 1–20). Springer Nature

36) Zeng, X., Duan, H., Wang, F., & Li, J. (2017). Examining environmental management of e-waste: China’s experience and lessons. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1076–1082.

37) Zhang, P. (2021). Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: How do government leaders tackle the “Environment-Economy” nexus? Public Administration Review, 81(2), 220–230.
Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Our Services and Policies

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.

The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.

Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 12 (December 2024).

PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 December 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online

Why with us

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis is better then other journals because:-
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.

The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

Indexed In
Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar