1Dedi Supandi, 2Sadu Wasistiono, 3Uday Madjid, 4Andi Pitono
1,2,3,4Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-63Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
One of the priorities of the West Java Provincial Government is the Village Development Movement (Village Gate). Gates of the Village is a movement to create an independent village, namely a village that is able to build and empower village communities by optimizing the utilization of all village potential, both natural resources, human resources and village infrastructure, through collaboration between the government, community and other stakeholders. The portrait of the implementation of the village development movement policy has not been effective in supporting the achievement of the target of a champion village in West Java Province, this is still found in the Dominant Poor Population in the Village, more Unemployment in the Village, 18 Villages Still lagging behind in Cianjur, Karawang and Tasikmalaya Regencies and only 50 percent villages implementing the Village Financial System. This study uses Muchlis Hamdi's theory (2014) with qualitative methods to understand the depth of the problem. This theory does not merely stand alone, it is also compared with other theories as a complement. Data collection methods were carried out through literature studies, field studies (observations), interviews, focus group discussions, and triangulation data analysis. Informants and resource persons were selected based on their competence on issues related to this research issue. All of the instruments used are expected to be able to get good results. This study found that in addition to the dimensions of productivity, linearity and efficiency of the policy implementation model based on Muchlis Hamdi's theory, a strategy is needed to encourage policy substance, implementing task behavior, network interaction, target group participation, and resources in implementing village development movement policies in the Province West Java. The strategy for implementing the village development movement policy includes elements of collaboration, transparency and innovation. The findings of this study illustrate that in order to create a champion village through the strategy of implementing the village building movement in West Java Province, a Triangel Coltin strategy (collaboration, transparency and innovation) is needed, where the collaboration strategy is carried out using the pentahelix approach by involving academia, the business world, community, government and media . The transfer strategy is to provide education to the community (educate citizen), consult with the community (Delibaretion Partner Community) and always monitor the implemented policies (Monitor Polcies).
KEYWORDS:Policy Implementation and Village Development Movement.
REFERENCES1) Abdu-Raheem, K. A. (2021). Preparedness for paid-and self-employment: perceptions amongst Ekiti State University agricultural students, Nigeria. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning.
2) Alom, M. M. (2018). Proactive transparency and outward accountability of frontline public bureaucracies: An integrated model. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
3) Antikainen, M., Uusitalo, T., & Kivikytö-Reponen, P. (2018). Digitalisation as an enabler of circular economy. Procedia CIRP, 73, 45-49.
4) Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789-798.
5) Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: Descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197-204.
6) Barmeyer, C., Mayrhofer, U., & Würfl, K. (2019). Informal information flows in organizations: The role of the Italian coffee break. International Business Review, 28(4), 796-801.
7) Beausoleil, A. M. (2018). Revisiting Rogers: the diffusion of his innovation development process as a normative framework for innovation managers, students and scholars. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4), 73-97.
8) Benotsmane, R., Kovács, G., & Dudás, L. (2019). Economic, social impacts and operation of smart factories in Industry 4.0 focusing on simulation and artificial intelligence of collaborating robots. Social Sciences, 8(5), 143.
9) Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 2(22).
10) Caiado, R. G. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., de Mattos Nascimento, D. L., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1276-1288.
11) Carayannis, E.G & Campbell, D.F.J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1 No. 1, 41-69.
12) Carayannis, E.G., Barth, T.D. & Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 1, 1-12.
13) Chaudhuri, S., Roy, M., McDonald, L. M., & Emendack, Y. (2021). Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 2973-3008.
14) Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674-1695.
15) Cohen, S. & Elmicke, W. 1998. Tools for Innovators: Creative Strategis for Managing Public Sector Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
16) De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87.
17) Divisekera, S., & Nguyen, V. K. (2018). Determinants of innovation in tourism evidence from Australia. Tourism Management, 67, 157-167.
18) Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2.
19) Fu, P. (2021). From bottom-up to top-down: governance, institutionalisation, and innovation in Chinese makerspaces. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(10), 1226-1241.
20) Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187-201.
21) Gimenez‐Fernandez, E., Abril, C., Breuer, H., & Gudiksen, S. (2021). Gamification approaches for open innovation implementation: A conceptual framework. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 455-474.
22) Globocnik, D., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2020). Synergy or conflict? The relationships among organisational culture, sustainability-related innovation performance, and economic innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(01), 2050004.
23) Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to quantitative research and data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12-18.
24) Halvorsen, T., Hauknes, J., Miles, I., & Røste, R. (2005). On innovation in the public sector. HALVORSEN, T.; HAUKNES, J.; MILES, I. On the differences between public and private sector innovation. Oslo: NIFU STEP, 2-21.
25) Hamdi, M. 2014. Kebijakan Publik; Proses Analisis dan Partisipasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
26) Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present”. Public Money and Management. January, Blackwell Publishing.
27) INDOPOV. 2007. Inovasi Pelayanan Pro-Miskin: Sembilan Studi Kasus di Indonesia. The World Bank: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit East Asia and Pacific Region.
28) Keiningham, T., Aksoy, L., Bruce, H. L., Cadet, F., Clennell, N., Hodgkinson, I. R., & Kearney, T. (2020). Customer experience driven business model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 116, 431-440.
29) Kellehear, A. (2020). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods. Routledge.
30) Lee, H. J., Kim, M. Y., Park, S. M., & Robertson, P. J. (2020). Public service motivation and innovation in the Korean and Chinese public sectors: Exploring the role of Confucian values and social capital. International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 496-534.
31) López-López, V., Iglesias-Antelo, S., Vázquez-Sanmartín, A., Connolly, R., & Bannister, F. (2018). E-Government, transparency & reputation: an empirical study of Spanish local government. Information Systems Management, 35(4), 276-293.
32) Lütjen, H., Schultz, C., Tietze, F., & Urmetzer, F. (2019). Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research, 104, 506-519.
33) McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249-267.
34) Morita, K., Okitasari, M., & Masuda, H. (2020). Analysis of national and local governance systems to achieve the sustainable development goals: case studies of Japan and Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 179-202.
35) Moşteanu, N. R., & Faccia, A. (2020). Digital Systems and New Challenges of Financial Management–FinTech, XBRL, Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies. Quality-Access to Success Journal, 21(174), 159-166.
36) Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.
37) Muluk, Khairul. 2008. Knowledge Management; Kunci Sukses Inovasi Pemerintahan Daerah. Malang: Bayu Media.
38) Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial marketing management, 73, 193-205.
39) Oeij, P. R., Van Der Torre, W., Vaas, F., & Dhondt, S. (2019). Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: Applying the innovation journey model. Journal of Business Research, 101, 243-254.
40) Petrus, C. M. M. A. L., & Djani, K. W. (2020). Innovation of Local Governance in Educational Affairs in Kupang City Province East Nusa Tenggara. Innovation, 11(5).
41) Ribeiro, A., Liliweri, A., Gana, F., & Djani, W. (2021). Public Administration Consolidation And Innovation In The Ministry Of Education And Culture Of The Republic Of Democracy Timor Leste (Case Studies In Central Inffordepe, Baucau And Viqueque Regions). Psychology and Education Journal, 58(5), 860-875.
42) Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach.
43) Rosselló Villalonga, J. (2018). Fiscal centralization: a remedy for corruption?. SERIEs-Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 9(4), 457-474.
44) Setiawan, A. D. (2020). The influence of national culture on responsible innovation: A case of CO2 utilisation in Indonesia. Technology in Society, 62, 101306.
45) Shan, S., Ahmad, M., Tan, Z., Adebayo, T. S., Li, R. Y. M., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: Tracking environmental sustainability. Energy, 234, 121243.
46) Suh, J., Harrington, J., & Goodman, D. (2018). Understanding the link between organizational communication and innovation: An examination of public, nonprofit, and for-profit organizations in South Korea. Public Personnel Management, 47(2), 217-244.
47) Taylor, A., Santiago, F., & Hynes, R. (2019). Relationships among leadership, organizational culture, and support for innovation. In Effective and creative leadership in diverse workforces (pp. 11-42). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
48) Toni, M., Renzi, M. F., & Mattia, G. (2018). Understanding the link between collaborative economy and sustainable behaviour: An empirical investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4467-4477.
49) Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11.
50) van Buuren, A., Lewis, J. M., Guy Peters, B., & Voorberg, W. (2020). Improving public policy and administration: exploring the potential of design. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 3-19.
51) Wagner, E. R., & Hansen, E. N. (2005). Innovation in large versus small companies: insights from the US wood products industry. Management decision.
52) Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management, 3-20.
53) Wojtaszek, H., & Miciuła, I. (2019). Analysis of factors giving the opportunity for implementation of innovations on the example of manufacturing enterprises in the Silesian province. Sustainability, 11(20), 5850.
54) Zadek, S., & Raynard, P. (2017). Partnership alchemy: Engagement, innovation and governance. In tomorrow’s history (pp. 253-266). Routledge.
VOLUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.