¹Faiza Rini,²Yelfiza,³Anggri Yulio Pernanda

^1,2,3Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

Online learning has become an option to be implemented in various schools because the development of IT technology and the COVID-19 pandemic have made online learning more popular to implement. Mobile LMS is the most dominant used in online learning. This study aims to produce a Mobile LMS framework developed from previous research based on the advantages and disadvantages. The review method used narrative review by identifying and summarizing previously published articles, avoid duplication of research, and look for new fields of study that have not been studied. The literatures are focused on three things such as (1) Mobile LMS theory, concept and approach, (2) Mobile LMS design and framework, and (3) Mobile LMS implementation. From articles researching about Mobile LMS published in reputable journals, there are 17 purposive selected papers. Based on the literature review, the Mobile LMS framework has not been integrated into devices and operating systems. Therefore, the author developed a Mobile LMS framework design based on Multiplatform, which is integrated by device and operating system based on references that have been used by previous researchers. This new Mobile LMS framework can be a reference for teachers and future researchers.

Design, Mobile LMS, New Framework, Implementation, Theory.

1) J. Hemabala and E. S. . Suresh, “The Frame Work Design Of Mobile Learning Management System,” Int. J. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 179–184, 2012.

2) I. F. Alifiyanti, F. H. Afifah, and N. Ramadoan, “Pemanfaatan learning management system (LMS) berbasis EDMODO materi fluida dinamis untuk peningkatan minat dan prestasi belajar Fisika siswa sekolah menengah,” Pros. SNFA (Seminar Nas. Fis. dan Apl., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 155, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28536.

3) M. T. Hidayat, T. Junaidi, A. Rizki, S. Sukirno, and N. Nuri-, “Development of Literature Model Based on Multiplatform Application,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2022, doi: doi.org/10.15294/jne.v8i1.31749.

4) J. E. Klobas and T. J. McGill, “The role of involvement in learning management system success,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 114–134, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5.

5) R. Scherer and F. Siddiq, “Revisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 53, pp. 48–57, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038.

6) S. Kathleen, “Student Collaboration and School Educational Technology: Technology Integration Practices in the Classroom,” i-manager’s J. Sch. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 53, 2016, doi: 10.26634/jsch.11.4.6012.

7) C. Angeli and N. Valanides, “Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK),” Comput. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 154–168, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006.

8) F. N. Al-Fahad, “Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2009.

9) D. Kim, D. Rueckert, D. Kim, and D. Seo, “Students ’ Perceptions Erceptions Rception of,” Lang. Learn., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 52–73, 2013.

10) M. Barati and S. Zolhavarieh, “Mobile Learning and Multi Mobile Service in Higher Education,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 297–299, 2012, doi: 10.7763/ijiet.2012.v2.135.

11) M. Sarrab, “Mobile Learning (M-Learning) and Educational Environments,” Int. J. Distrib. Parallel Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 31–38, 2012, doi: 10.5121/ijdps.2012.3404.

12) S. McQuiggan, J. McQuiggan, J. Sabourin, and L. Kosturko, Mobile learning: A handbook for developers, educators, and learners. John Wiley \& Sons, 2015.

13) M. Sarrab, M. Elbasir, and S. Alnaeli, “Towards a quality model of technical aspects for mobile learning services: An empirical investigation,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 55, pp. 100–112, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.003.

14) M. Alrasheedi and L. F. Capretz, “An Empirical Study of Critical Success Factors of Mobile Learning Platform from the Perspective of Instructors,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 211–219, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.463.

15) G. D. Borman and N. Maritza Dowling, “Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 367–409, 2008,
doi: 10.3102/0034654308321455.

16) H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, no. July, pp. 333–339, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

17) J. Creswell, “Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches,” Res. Des., pp. 1–26, 2013.

18) O. Ozan, “SCAFFOLDING IN CONNECTIVIST MOBILE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 44–55, 2013.

19) G. Siemens and G. Conole, “Special Issue - Connectivism: Design and Delivery of Social Networked Learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 3, 2011, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.994.

20) N. Tura, A. Kutvonen, and P. Ritala, “Platform design framework: conceptualisation and application,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 881–894, 2018, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1390220.

21) Y. Zidoun, F.-Z. El arroum, M. Talea, and R. Dehbi, “Students’ Perception About Mobile Learning in Morocco: Survey Analysis,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 80, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v10i4.5947.

22) B. A. Kumar and S. S. Chand, “Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 471– 487, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9783-6.

23) A. Gorbunovs, Z. Timsans, B. Zuga, and V. Zagorskis, “Conceptual design of the new generation adaptive learning management system,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.28, p. 129, May 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12894.

24) F. S. Kabir and A. T. Kadage, “ICTS and educational development: The utilization of mobile phones in distance education in Nigeria,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2017, doi: 10.17718/tojde.285716.

25) X. R. Añonuevo, V. Nocum, C. Ramiro, R. V Baricanosa, and M. R. Prospero, “Online Learning Management System in Multi- platform Devices,” LPU-Lagura J. Eng. Comput. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 47–53, 2019.

26) U. B. Ozkan, H. Cigdem, and T. Erdogan, “Artificial neural network approach to predict LMS acceptance of vocational school students,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 156–169, 2020, doi: 10.17718/TOJDE.762045.

27) A. Raman and Y. Don, “Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 157–164, 2013, doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n7p157.

28) B. Šumak, G. Polančič, and M. Heričko, “An empirical study of virtual learning environment adoption using UTAUT,” 2nd Int. Conf. Mobile, Hybrid, On-Line Learn. eL mL 2010, pp. 17–22, 2010, doi: 10.1109/eLmL.2010.11.

29) G. Khatser and M. Khatser, “Online Learning Through LMSs : Comparative Assessment of Canvas and Moodle,” pp. 184– 200.

30) J. A. Ruipérez-Valiente, S. Halawa, R. Slama, and J. Reich, “Using multi-platform learning analytics to compare regional and global MOOC learning in the Arab world,” Comput. Educ., vol. 146, no. November 2019, p. 103776, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103776.

31) B. O. Smith and J. Wagner, “Adjusting for guessing and applying a statistical test to the disaggregation of value-added learning scores,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 307–323, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00220485.2018.1500959.

32) A. Navarro, J. Cristóbal, C. Fernández-Chamizo, and A. Fernández-Valmayor, “Architecture of a multiplatform virtual campus,” Softw. Pract. Exp., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1229–1246, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1002/spe.1130.

33) K. Q. Hussein and M. A. Al-Bayati, “Multi-Mode e-Learning System of Reading Skills for Deaf Students Based on Visual Multimedia,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 67–78, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i10.29831.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.