¹Daru Adi Wijaya,²Guntur,³Abdul Alim,⁴Rumpis Agus Sudarko,⁵Wahyu Dwi Yulianto

^1,2,3,4,5Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta Indonesia

This study aims to evaluate the futsal club program using the CIPP model (context, input process & product) with a qualitative approach and an interactive analysis model from Miles & Huberman. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach method. The object of evaluation is SKN FC Kebumen. Six participants were deliberately selected as interview participants. Data collection was carried out as follows: (1) making indirect observations; observing news about the object of evaluation, direct observation; observing activities in the mess and team exercises (2) conducting documentation, (3) conducting interviews with six participants. The instrument was validated by using ‘expert judgment’. Success criteria evaluate each CIPP variable with three categories: good, fair, and poor. With the CIPP analysis combined with a comprehensive approach, the evaluation results in terms of context include vision and mission and the club’s goals in living the league is included in th e “fair” category. In terms of input, which includes recruiting players and coaches is in the “good” category. Regarding the process, which includes implementing training programs, provision, use, maintenance of facilities and infrastructure, and funding is included in the “fair” category. In terms of products, which include positive and negative results, alignment of goals with costs and achievements generated, program success, and programs that can be continued is in the “good” category.

CIPP Evaluation, Coaching, Futsal

1) Alkin, M. C. 2011. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. New York: The Guilford Press.

2) Arin, Triyasari. 2016. Evaluasi Pembinaan Olahraga Senam Artistik di Klub Senam Kabupaten Pati dan Kabupaten Rembang. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. JPES 5 (1).

3) Bompa, Tudor and Carrera, Micheal. 2015. Conditioning Young Athletes. United States: Human Kinetics.

4) Brannen, Julia. 2005. Memandu metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

5) Creswell, J. W. 2015. Penelitian kualitatif &desain riset: Memilih di antara lima pendekatan. (Terjemahan Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. (Edisi asli terbitan tahun 2013 oleh SAGE Publication Thousand Oaks California).

6) Duarte, R., Batalha, N., & Falgado, H. 2009. Effects of exercise deration and number of players in heart rate responses and technical skills during futsal small-sided games. The Open Sports Science Journal, 2, 37-41.

7) Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. 2012. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34(5), PP. 288-299. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637.

8) Klenowski, V. 2010. Curriculum evaluation: Approaches and methodologies. Dalam Peterson, P., Baker E., & McGaw, B. (Ed), international encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 335-341.

9) Le Gall, F., Carling, C., William, M., & Reilly, T. 2010. Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy. Journal of science and Medicine in sport 13(1), PP: 90-95. DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.004.

10) Lippe, Megan, and Patricia Carter. “Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 13, no. 1 (January 2018): 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008.

11) Meylan, C., Cronin, J., Oliver, J., & Hughes, M. 2010. Talent identification in soccer: The role of maturity status on physical, physiological and technical characteristics. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 5(4), 571-592.

12) Moscoso, S. C., Chaves, S. S., Vidal, M. P., &Argilaga, M. T. A. 2012. Reporting a program evaluation: Needs, program plan, intervention, and decisions. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13(1), PP: 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/S1697- 2600(13)70008-5.

13) Muryadi, A. D. 2017. Model Evaluasi Program Dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas. ISSN: 2442:3874 Vol.3 No.1.

14) Mustofa, A. A. 2020. Evaluasi Manajemen Pembinaan Prestasi Ekstrakurikuler Bola Basket di SMA Negeri 1 Krangkeng Kabupaten Indramayu. S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana UNY.

15) Norris. J. M. 2016. Language Program Evaluation. The Modern Languege Journal Georgetown University Departement of Linguistics 421 37th St. NW, Box 571051.

16) Setyoko, A., Tunas, B., Sunaryo, W. 2016. Evaluation of School Operation Assistance by Using CIPP Model in Indonesia Private Islamic Elementery School. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research. 4. 44-49

17) Sukardi. 2015. Evaluasi program pendidikan dan pelatihan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

18) Sumarno, Sumarno and Irianto, Djoko Pekik. 2019. Evaluasi Manajemen Klub Perserikatan Sepakbola Indonesia Mataram (PSIM) Yogyakarta. S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana UNY.

19) Travassos, B.. Araujo, D., & Vilar, L. 2011. Interpersonal coordination and ball dynamic in futsal (indoor football). Human Movement Science. Vol. 30, pp. 1245-1259.

20) Unnithan, V., White, J., Georgiou, A., Iga, J., & Drust, B. 2012. Talent identification in youth soccer. Journal of sports sciences, 30(15), 1719-1726.

21) Widoyoko, S. E. P. 2013. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

22) Wiyanto, A. 2017. Career orientation and education badminton athletes Central Java. The 4th International Conference on Physical Education, Sport and Health (Ismina), Indonesia. 879-885.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.