¹Henny Juliani,²Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa,³Solechan,⁴Sonhaji

^1,2,3,4Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Indonesian Regulations Related to State Losses in Persero State-Owned Enterprises Partly Owned by the State. Persero SOE as a form of SOE has capital in the form of share ownership which is wholly or at least 51% (fifty-one percent) of its shares owned by the Republic of Indonesia. The main objective is to pursue profit. Thus, it is possible that in an SOE Persero, the shares are not only owned by the state but also partially owned by other parties. Therefore, the capital of the SOE is partly or wholly derived from state finances. The type of research used was qualitative research, especially doctrinal legal research. It used a statute approach, collecting data and legal materials through library research and analyzing using qualitative analysis. The research results obtained were state assets that have been transformed into SOE capital whose management was subject to the business paradigm (business judgment rules). However, the separation of state assets does not turn them into SOEs assets which are independent of state assets. Therefore, the operationalization of SOEs is based on both private law and public law.

Regulation; state loss; State Owned Enterprises; share.

1) Asri Putri, T., & Herning Sitabuana, T. (2022). Pengawasan Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn). SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(7), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i7.118

2) Avianti, I. (2017). Privatisasi Bumn Dan Penegakan Good Corporate Governance Dan Kinerja Bumn. Kinerja, 10(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v10i1.919

3) Dian Ety Mayasari. (2014). KEDUDUKAN BUMN SEBAGAI KEKAYAAN NEGARA DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA. Sapientia et Virtus, 1(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i7.118

4) Fitriyanti;, F. P. (2022). Teori Sumber vs Teori Badan Hukum dan Teori Transformasi Keuangan Dalam Menafsirkan Status Hukum Keuangan Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Syntax Literate, Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(8), 10708–10723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i8.9179

5) Hakim, M. H. (2016). Pergeseran Orientasi Penelitian Hukum: Dari Doktrinal Ke Sosio-Legal. Syariah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 16(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v16i2.1031

6) Indarti, E. (2016). Bridging the Gaps.: a Paradigmatic Insight Into Philosophy of Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.1.1.2016.1-16

7) Juliani, H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Bumn Terhadap Perbuatan Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.299-306

8) M Ivan Mahdi. (2021). Jumlah BUMN Tinggal 107 pada 2020. DataIndonesia.Id.

9) Makawimbang, H. F. (2014). Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Liberty.

10) Merriam, S. . (2014). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, Revised and Expanded from Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass.

11) Nainggolan, E. U. (2020). Raksasa Itu Bernama BUMN. Https://Www.Djkn.Kemenkeu.Go.Id.

12) Nugroho, R., & Wrihatnolo, R. R. (2008). Manajemen Privatisasi BUMN. Gramedia.

13) Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2006). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

14) Roza, N. (2022). Problematika Penentuan Status Keuangan Negara Dalam Badan Usaha Milik Negara Persero. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art4

15) Rumata, V. M. (2017). Dinamika Tata Kelola Kebijakan Industri Penyiaran dan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Menuju Konvergensi. Jurnal Penelitian Pos Dan Informatika, 5(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.17933/jppi.2015.0501006

16) Susila Wibawa, K. C. (2019). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Pelayanan Publik sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.218-234

17) Thamrin, H. (2013). Hukum Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Aswaja Pressindo.

18) Tricker. (1994). International Corporate Governance. Prentice Hall, Inc.

19) Wibawa, K. C. S., & Susanto, S. N. (2020). Establishing a special autonomy model in Bali as a means of preserving hindu balinese culture and space. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1609–1614.

20) Wibowo;, R. A., Simamora;, Y. S., Anisah;, S., Putri;, K. D. N., & Jurniawan;, F. (2021). Kontrak Pemerintah: Konsep, Ragam, Perkembangan Regulasi, dan Kajian Putusan. Kencana.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.