Yeti Kuswati

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia

Since Woodrow Wilson “stirred up” the United States public through his writing entitled The Study of Administration (1887) in the journal Political Science Quarterly, state administration began to develop to worldwide, including to Indonesia. Since the 1990s, the state administration has grown considerably compared to Wilson's time. It cannot be denied that the development of State Administration Science is so massive in its home country of the United States and other Anglo-Saxon countries such as England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. While in developing countries, the dynamics of State Administration is not so intense because there is still strong political, bureaucratic and cultural control. The concept of “State Administration” is not “public administration” for a while until the author can accept the logic thinking (epistemology) of Public Administration as the mainstream science of State Administration in Indonesia today. In theory, concepts and paradigms, state administration is experiencing a fairly rapid development. Many contemporary theories have emerged in the repertoire of State Administration that criticize and enrich classical theories such as theories about Organization and bureaucracy. That development is something natural considering that state administration is part of the social sciences that have dynamic characteristics, unlike the Natural Sciences which tend to be passive and positivistic. This development should be appreciated because it indicates that the state administration is able to exist in the midst of increasingly complex community problems and needs concrete solutions.

State Administration, Public Administration

1) Aneta, A. (2012). Perkembangan teori administrasi negara. Jurnal Inovasi, 9(01).

2) Aziz, A., Hidayat, A., Herlina, E., & Ernawati, W. (2023). Oligopoly Market and Monopolistic Competition in the Digital Era: Shariah Economic Perspective. Quality - Access to Success, 24(193), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.193.07

3) Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. ME Sharpe.

4) BYERS, L. G. (1980). The Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh in the Litchfield era. University of Pittsburgh.

5) Cristofaro, M. (2020). “I feel and think, therefore I am”: An Affect-Cognitive Theory of management decisions. European Management Journal, 38(2), 344–355.

6) Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe. Inc.

7) Djubaedi, D., Rohadi, T., & Kodama, Y. (2023). Core Entrepreneurial Competencies for Local Content Curriculum. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 2(1 SE-Articles), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v2i1.38

8) Dwiyanto, A. (2004). Reorientasi Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Dari Government ke Governance. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.

9) Ginting, R., & Haryati, T. (2011). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. CIVIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(2).

10) Gow, J. I., & Dufour, C. (2000). Is the New Public Management a Paradigm? Does it Matter? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(4), 573–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300664002

11) Henry, N. (2015). Public administration and public affairs. Routledge.

12) Herbert, A. W. (2004). Transforming public service in a world without boundaries. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 390–394.

13) Ibrahim, J. T. (2019). Sosiologi Pedesaan. UMMPress.

14) Johan, T. S. B. (2018). Perkembangan Ilmu Negara dalam Peradaban Globalisasi Dunia. Deepublish.

15) Karazsia, Z. (2012). Peace Inc.? The Role of Contractors in International Peace Operations. University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, 11.

16) Kurhayadi, H., Rohayati, Y., & Bambang Sucipto, M. M. (2020). Kebijakan Publik di Era Digitalisasi. Insan Cendekia Mandiri.

17) Lutfi, M. (2020). Legal politics and public policies in the industrial era 4.0 (an Indonesian legal civilization discourse perspective of prophetic science religiousity). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 456(1), 12084.

18) Mahsyar, A. (2011). Masalah pelayanan publik di Indonesia dalam perspektif administrasi publik. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2).

19) Nur, A. C., Akib, H., & Niswaty, R. (2022). EKSISTENSI ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK PADA ARUS GLOBALISASI. Badan Penerbit UNM.

20) Nuraini, S. (2020). Penerapan etika administrasi publik sebagai upaya dalam mewujudkan good governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi, 14(1).

21) Pasolong, H. (2014). Teori administrasi publik. Alfabeta Bandung.

22) Picard, L. A., Buss, T. F., Seybolt, T. B., & Lelei, M. C. (2015). Sustainable development and human security in Africa: Governance as the missing link (Vol. 196). CRC Press.

23) Pratomo, H. W. (2022). Educational Leadership: Islamic Religious, Philosophy, Psychology, and Sociology Perspectives. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 05(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i5-26

24) Ramdhani, A., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Konsep umum pelaksanaan kebijakan publik. Jurnal Publik: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 11(1), 1–12.

25) Rochmat, C. S., Yoranita, A. S. P., & Putri, H. A. (2022). Islamic Boarding School Educational Values in Efforts to Realize Student Life Skills at University of Darussalam Gontor. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.18

26) Saglie, J., & Sivesind, K. H. (2018). Civil society institutions or semi-public agencies? State regulation of parties and voluntary organizations in Norway. Journal of Civil Society, 14(4), 292–310.

27) Shafritz, J., Russell, E. W., Borick, C., & Hyde, A. (2016). Introducing public administration. Routledge.

28) Soehartono, K. T., Aldyan, A., & Indriyani, R. (2021). The establishing paradigm of dominus litis principle in Indonesian administrative justice. Sriwijaya Law Review, 5(1), 42–55.

29) Soraya, N. (1980). Factors related to academic advisement of international graduate students at the University of Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh.

30) Supriatin, S., Rithpho, P., Asiah, A., & Hikhmat, R. (2022). Blended Learning to Improve the Physical Examination Ability of Nursing Students. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.20

31) Thoha, M. (2017). Dinamika ilmu administrasi publik. Kencana.

32) Tjokrowinoto, M. (1996). Perkembangan Mutakhir Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Teori-Teori Politik Dewasa Ini.

33) Ulum, M. C. (2018). Public Service: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Isu-Isu Strategis Pelayanan Publik. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

34) Wahab, S. A. (2021). Analisis kebijakan: dari formulasi ke penyusunan model-model implementasi kebijakan publik. Bumi Aksara.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.