¹Hanif Hardianto,²Nina Farliana

¹Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Social Science, and Political Science, Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang,Indonesia

²Department of Economic Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang,Indonesia

The study aimed to examine the comparative study of the Indonesian State Judicial Commission and the French State Judicial Commission. In the analysis, the normative analysis method is used by observing inferior information because it emphasizes more on research from various legal books, journals and previous research literature. The results of this study are the Judicial Commission even though its position is supporting to the judicial authority body. The authority of the Judicial Commission in court is not as one who decides on a case but as an enforcement agency for ethical norms. In the field of judges, the Judicial Commission is not involved in terms of organization, personnel, administration and finance. Related to this, the Judicial Commission is different from those in European countries, for example France. The Judicial Commission in France (Conseil Superieur de la Magistrature or CSM) has authority in specific areas based on technical policies and policy-making on the judicial aspect. The French Judicial Commission as well as in Europe usually has authority regarding agency management, calculation and administration of justice including in carrying out advertisements, transfers, recruitment and distributing rewards to judges. The authority of the Supreme Court is an institution that carries out the functions of the judiciary and its duties are related to adjudicating and not dealing with matters related to the administration and organization of justice.

Judicial Commission, Indonesia, France

1) Ardhanariswari, R., Fauzan, M., & Haryanto, T. (2021). The Synergy of Judicial Power Administrators with Judicial Commission in Regard to Recruitment of Judges in Indonesia.

2) Ahmad, K. (2021). The Petrial Institutions in the Perspective of Judge’s Independence, Corruption Eradication Commission and Human Rights: A Juridical-Empirical Study according to Indonesian Legal System. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, 9(12), 655-665.

3) Mancini, G. F. (2018). The making of a constitution for Europe. In The new European community (pp. 177-194). Routledge.

4) Heumann, M. (2020). Plea bargaining: The experiences of prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys. University of Chicago Press.

5) Weingast, B. R. (2013). Why developing countries prove so resistant to the rule-of-law. In Global perspectives on the rule of law (pp. 44-68). Routledge-Cavendish.

6) Scheppele, K. L., Kochenov, D. V., & Grabowska-Moroz, B. (2021). EU values are law, after all: Enforcing EU values through systemic infringement actions by the European Commission and the member states of the European Union. Yearbook of European law, 39, 3-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaa012

7) Krygier, M. (2016). The rule of law: pasts, presents, and two possible futures. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134103

8) Roussy, M., & Brivot, M. (2016). Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 714-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2014-1843

9) Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2016). Is the European Commission really in decline? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12358

10) Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2019). The ‘political’roles of the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1572135

11) Kmezić, M. (2021). Rule of law and democracy in the Western Balkans: addressing the gap between policies and practice. In Illiberal Politics in Southeast Europe (pp. 177-192). Routledge.

12) Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009

13) Sutiyoso, B. (2011). Penguatan Peran Komisi Yudisial dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(2), 266-284. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art7

14) Kusuma, B. A., Fajriah, M. R. A., & Putri, R. N. A. K. (2020). Optimalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial terhadap Hakim. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 42-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v5i1p42-50

15) Berger, E. (2014). The criminal jury in England and France in the late 18th century. Popular Justice in Europe, 87-88.

16) Huber, K. E. (2017). Punishing Abortion: Duty, Morality, and Practicality in Early 20th‐Century France. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 76(1), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12176

17) Grant, T. D. (2022). Arbitration, corruption and post-award control in French and English courts. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 71(2), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000070

18) Bjorge, E. (2014). A theory of national application of the European Convention on Human Rights (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, UK).

19) Biland, É., & Steinmetz, H. (2017). Are judge street-level bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian family courts. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(2), 298-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12251

20) Garapon, A., & Epineuse, H. (2012). Judicial independence in France. In Judicial Independence in Transition (pp. 273-305). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

21) Vauchez, A. (2018). The strange non-death of statism: Tracing the everprotracted rise of judicial self-government in France. German Law Journal, 19(7), 1613-1640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S207183220002318X

22) Coman, R. (2014). Quo vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(6), 892-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.905385

23) Doyle, W. (2018). The Oxford history of the French revolution. Oxford University Press.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.