¹Isnain Dyah, ²Wawan Sundawan Suherman

^1,2Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta Indonesia

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency based on the aspects of Context, Input, Process, and Product. The evaluation model that will be used in this study is the CIPP model. The subject of this evaluation is Public Elementary Schools in Bantul Regency, totaling 273 schools. The sampling technique used the Slovin formula with a sampling error of 10% in 73 schools. Furthermore, the sample in this study was determined using a purposive sampling technique, with the following criteria: the researcher took 1 physical education teacher, 1 school principal, and parents of students who were willing to become samples and filled out questionnaires from researchers. Data collection techniques used observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique in this study is descriptive quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results showed that the evaluation of the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency was 2.41 in the poor category. Based on each evaluation component, the following conclusions are obtained. (1) Context evaluation of the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency, at 2.59, is in the good category. The physical education learning philosophy indicator is 2.57 in the good category and the physical education learning objectives are 2.61 in the good category. (2) The input for evaluating the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency, amounting to 2.39, is in the poor category. The teacher profile indicator is 2.44 in the less category, the student profile is 2.25 in the less category, and learning facilities and infrastructure is 2.49 in the less. (3) The process of evaluating the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency, amounting to 2.38, is in the poor category. The RPP indicator is 2.56 in the good category and the implementation of online learning is 2.20 in the less category. (4) Product evaluation of the implementation of physical education online learning in public elementary schools in Bantul Regency, amounting to 2.29, is in the poor category. The learning process evaluation indicator is 2.26 in the less category and the evaluation of learning outcomes is 2.31 in the less category.

Evaluation, physical education online learning, the Covid-19 pandemic.

1) Hazaymeh, W. A. (2021). EFL students' perceptions of online distance learning for enhancing english language learning during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 501-518.

2) Almazova, N., Krylova, E., Rubtsova, A., & Odinokaya, M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for Russian higher education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ perspective. Education Sciences, 10(12), 368.

3) Chansanam, W., Tuamsuk, K., Poonpon, K., & Ngootip, T. (2021). Development of online learning platform for Thai university students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(8), 348-355.

4) Nadeak, B. (2020). The effectiveness of distance learning using social media during the pandemic period of COVID-19: A case in Universitas Kristen Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 1764-1772.

5) Reyes-Chua, E., Sibbaluca, B. G., Miranda, R. D., Palmario, G. B., Moreno, R. P., & Solon, J. P. T. (2020). The status of the implementation of the e-learning classroom in selected higher education institutions in region IV-A amidst the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 253-258.

6) Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H. H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University, 1-54.

7) Kumar, V., & Nanda, P. (2018). Social media in higher education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(40).

8) Sahoo, S. R., & Gupta, B. B. (2020). Popularity-based detection of malicious content in facebook using machine learning approach. In First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence (pp. 163-176). Springer, Singapore.

9) Walton-Fisette, J. L., & Wuest, D. A. (2018). Foundations of physical education, exercise science, and sport. McGraw-Hill Education.

10) Razouki, A., Khzami, S. E., Selmaoui, S., & Agorram, B. (2021). The contribution of physical and sports education to health education of Moroccan middle school students: Representations and practices of teachers. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 201.

11) Petrie, K., Pope, C., & Powell, D. (2021). Grappling with complex ideas: Physical education, physical literacy, physical activity, sport and play in one professional learning initiative. The Curriculum Journal, 32(1), 103-117.

12) Terekhina, E. N., Batagovskaya, T. A., Sumak, E. N., & Koroleva, A. A. (2021). Physical education and health improvement methodology as a means of preventing maladaptive disorders in students under self-isolation caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physical education and Sport, 21, 2272-2276.

13) Rudd, J. R., O’Callaghan, L., & Williams, J. (2019). Physical education pedagogies built upon theories of movement learning: How can environmental constraints be manipulated to improve children’s executive function and self-regulation skills?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(9), 1630.

14) Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during covid-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36 (COVID19-S4), S27.

15) Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7).

16) Zylfiu, D., Gerbeshi, B., & Rasimi, D. (2020). Challenges and advantages of online learning: the case of Kosovo. International Journal of Management, 11(10).

17) Hussein, E., Daoud, S., Alrabaiah, H., & Badawi, R. (2020). Exploring undergraduate students’ attitudes towards emergency online learning during COVID-19: A case from the UAE. Children and youth services review, 119, 105699.

18) Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.

19) Ahmed, V., & Opoku, A. (2021). Technology supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: the case of Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1-41.

20) Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical education online, 24(1), 1666538.

21) Pilkington, O. A. (2018). Active learning for an online composition classroom: Blogging as an enhancement of online curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(2), 213-226.

22) Birgili, B. (2021). Evaluation of a strategic management program: context, input, process, product model as a prototype for business academies. TEM Journal, 10(1), 204-214.

23) Finney, T. L. (2020). Confirmative evaluation: new CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 18(2), 30.

24) Erdogan, G., & Mede, E. (2021). The evaluation of an english preparatory program using cipp model and exploring A1 Level Students’ Motivational Beliefs. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1).

25) Zuliyanti, P., Sukirwan, S., & Yuhana, Y. (2021). Persepsi peserta didik SMA terhadap pembelajaran daring pada mata pelajaran matematika di masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1462-1475.

26) Budi, D. R., Listiandi, A. D., Festiawan, R., Widanita, N., & Anggraeni, D. (2020). Indeks masa tubuh (imt): kajian analisis pada atlet renang junior usia sekolah dasar. TEGAR: Journal of Teaching Physical education in Elementary School, 3(2), 46–53.

27) Nur, L., Malik, A. A., Juditya, S., Kastrena, E., Widyawan, D., Agustan, B., ... & Yang, C. B. (2020). Comparison of two types of instruction in physical education. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 1785-1793.

28) Suhartoyo, T., Budi, D. R., Kusuma, M. N. H., Syafei, M., Listiandi, A. D., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Identifikasi kebugaran jasmani peserta didik SMP di daerah dataran tinggi Kabupaten Banyumas. Physical Activity Journal (PAJU), 1(1), 8-17.

29) Mustafa, P. S., & Dwiyogo, W. D. (2020). Kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan di Indonesia Abad 21. JARTIKA Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 422-438.

30) Budi, D. R., Hidayat, R., & Febriani, A. R. (2019). The application of tactical approaches in learning handballs. JUARA: Jurnal Olahraga, 4(2), 131-139.

31) Sayfei, M., Budi, D. R., Kusuma, M. N. H., & Listiandi, A. D. (2020). Identifikasi keberbakatan menggunakan metode australian sport search terhadap kesesuaian cabang olahraga pada anak sekolah dasar. Physical Activity Journal (PAJU), 1(2), 99-106.

32) Haryanto. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran (konsep dan manajemen). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

33) Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2020). Corona virus pushes education online. Nature Materials, 687-687

34) Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Hyun, C. C., Wijayanti, L. M., & Putri, R. S. (2020). Studi eksploratif dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap proses pembelajaran online di sekolah dasar. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 1-12.

35) Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran online di tengah pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 81-89.

36) Huzaimah, P. Z., & Amelia, R. (2021). Hambatan yang dialami peserta didik dalam pembelajaran daring matematika pada masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 533-541.

37) Suherman, W. S. (2021). Physical education online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic: effectiveness, motivation, and learning outcomes. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 3(01), 123-137.

38) Maphalala, M., Khumalo, N., & Khumalo, P. N. (2021). Student teachers’ experiences of the emergency transition to online learning during the COVID-19 lockdown at a South African university. Perspectives in Education, 39(3), 30-43.

39) Pandey, D., Aswari, A., Taufiqurakman, M., Khalim, A., & Azahrah, F. F. (2021). System of education changes due to covid-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 10-15.

40) Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86-103.

41) Semradova, I., & Hubackova, S. (2016). Teacher responsibility in distance education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 544-550.

42) Saefulmilah, R. M. I., & Saway, M. H. M. (2020). Hambatan-hambatan pada pelaksanaan pembelajaran daring di SMA Riyadhul Jannah Jalancagak Subang. NUSANTARA, 2(3), 393-404.

43) Jumaeda, S., & Alam, S. N. (2020). Evaluasi pelaksanaan classroom assesment di Madrasah Tsanawiayah di Seppange Kecamatan Bengo Kabupaten Bone. al-Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 5(2), 66-79.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.