¹Lusia Indrastuti, ²Rian Saputra

^1,2Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi Jl. Sumpah Pemuda No.18, Surakarta City, Central Java Province, Indonesia

This study aims to see and describe the practice of electronic justice in Indonesia based on the Digital Constitutionalism approach, as a concept that tends to be new, Digital Constitutionalism in its development also accommodates the due process of online in scientific discourse. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the practice of electronic justice in Indonesia is currently still using procedural law guidelines which are basically conventional procedural law plus the internal regulations of the judiciary. Meanwhile, the development of electronic justice that utilizes technological advances is not enough to use the conventional procedural law base in its implementation because it is annulled yet oriented to the protection of Human Rights as conceptualized in the Digital Constitutionalism discourse, which includes the due process of online. So the regulation of electronic justice in the future must be based on Digital Constitutionalism, which includes knowing the due process of online by prioritizing the protection of human rights in a virtual scope from the provider of electronic judicial technology facilities.

Electronic Justice, Digital Constitutionalism, Due Process of Online, Human Rights, Indonesian Legal System

1) Adisti, N. A., Nashriana, N., Murilah, I., & Mardiansyah, A. (2021). PELAKSANAAN PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA SECARA ELEKTRONIK PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KOTA PALEMBANG. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i2.768

2) Apeldoorn, L. J. van. (1986). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Pradnya Paramita.

3) Celeste, E. (2022). Digital Constitutionalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003256908

4) Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenadamedia Group.

5) Gupta, M., Chandra, B., & Gupta, M. P. (2014). A framework of intelligent decision support system for Indian police. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(5), 512–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2012-0073

6) Hamzah, A. (1988). Delik-delik terhadap Penyelenggaraan Negara (Contempt of Court). Sinar Grafika.

7) Jørgensen, R. F., & Pedersen, A. M. (2017). Online Service Providers as Human Rights Arbiters (pp. 179–199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_10

8) Laidlaw, E. B. (2008). Private Power, Public Interest: An Examination of Search Engine Accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 17(1), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/ean018

9) MARONI, M. (2021). Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives Nicolas P Suzor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 210 pp. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(1), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.72

10) Olsen, H. P., Slosser, J. L., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2021). What’s in the Box? In Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society (pp. 219–235). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.012

11) Phillipson, G., Law, S., Problems, C., Court, T., & The, O. (2014). Trial by Media : The Betrayal of the First Amendment ’ s Purpose All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TRIAL BY MEDIA : THE BETRAYAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT ’ S PURPOSE. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(4), 15–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27654682

12) Putra, D. (2020). A MODERN JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA: LEGAL BREAKTHROUGH OF E-COURT AND E-LEGAL PROCEEDING. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 9(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297

13) Reksodiputro, M. (1994). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum, Lembaga Kriminologi, Universitas Indonesia.

14) Saputra, R., Ardi, M. K., Pujiyono, P., & Firdaus, S. U. (2021). Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(2), 437–482. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371

15) Scholten, P. (1993). Penuntun Dalam Mempelajari Hukum Perdata Belanda. Gadjah Mada University Press.

16) Sudarsono. (2018). Penerapan Peradilan Elektronik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (The Implementation of Electronic Court in Administrative Judiciary). Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.112018.%25p

17) Supardjaja, K. E. (2002). Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiil di Indonesia (Studi Kasus tentang Penerapan dan Perkembangannya dalam Yurisprudensi). Alumni.

18) Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666428

19) Tahir, H. (2010). Proses Hukum yang Adil dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. LaksBang.

20) Veselovska, N., Slipeniuk, V., Yasynok, D., Zhukevych, I., & Gorbenko, A. (2021). Electronic Proceedings in Modern Legal Conditions. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(8), 224–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.8.30

21) Widodo, J. S. (2022). The Controversy Of The Over Granting Remissions Against Narcotics Abused During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v1i2.26533

22) Yadav, S., Edwards, P., & Porter, J. (2020). Evaluation of first information reports of Delhi police for injury surveillance: Data extraction tool development & validation. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 152(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_442_20

Volume 05 Issue 09 September 2022

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.