Mpundu Chilonga

University Librarian, Kwame Nkrumah University KABWE, ZAMBIA

This paper presents an extract from the cross sectional study conducted at the University of Lusaka to assess the information literacy of skills of students. Information literacy has been found to be the necessary skill for students at the tertiary level of education. This has been necessitated by the advancement in technology coupled with the exponential growth of information, both physical and in digital format, which demands that students should have necessary competencies for them to effectively, and efficiently access, use and share the information to solve problems and create new knowledge.
The study adopted a mixed method research approach. The survey design was used for data collection. The survey followed a cross-sectional approach and employed questionnaires as instruments of data collection. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 16, was used for data analysis. The study population was made up of full-time university students from all the five faculties of the university. These were the faculties of Law, Business, Education, Social Sciences & Technology (ESST), Health Sciences and Graduate Studies. The sample size of One hundred students were sampled using the proportional stratified random sampling. The findings from the study revealed that the students faced challenges to find the required information in the library. The challenges included their inability to access the needed information, synthesise their work and provide references. The findings were attributed to many factors which included the lack of a systematic approach information literacy skills.

Information literacy, user education, communication skills, librarian and faculty collaboration

1) Adzobu, N.Y.A. (2014). Building digital collections in a public university library in Ghana: priority-setting and user needs assessment. Collection Building, 33 (2):38-45. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

2) Ajiboye, J.O. & Tella, A. (2007). University undergraduate students’ information seeking behaviour: implications for quality in higher education in Africa. TOJET, 6(1):40- 52. Available at www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500071.pdf

3) Andersen, J. (2006). The public sphere and discursive activities: information literacy as social political skills. Journal of documentation, 62(2):213-228. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

4) Anunobi, C.V. & Ukwoma, S. (2016). Information literacy in Nigerian universities trends, challenges and opportunities. New Library World, 117(5/6):343-359. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com

5) Anunobi, C.V. (2008). The Role of Academic Libraries in Universal Access to Print and Electronic Resources in Developing Countries. Library Philosophy and Practice. Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/

6) Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago: ALA. Available at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracy competency

7) Baro, E.E. & Fyneman, B. (2009). Information literacy among undergraduate students in Niger Delta University. The Electronic Library, 27(4):659-675. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

8) Birch, R.G. (2012). The impact of information literacy instruction on the library anxiety and information competency of graduate students. Ed.D. Dissertations. 41. http://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/edd_diss/41

9) Brendle-Moczuk, D. (2006). Encouraging students’ lifelong learning through graded information literacy assignments. Reference Services Review, 34(4):498-508. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

10) Choy, F.C. & Goh, S.N. (2016). A Framework for planning academic library spaces. The Library Management, 37(1/2):13- 28. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

11) Critz, L., Axford, M., Baer, W.M., Doty, C., Lowe, H & Renfro, C. (2012). Development of the graduate library user education series. Reference Services Review, 40(4):530-542. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

12) Davis, E. L., Lundstrom, K. & Martin, P.N. (2011). Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models. Reference Services Review, 39(4):686-702. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

13) Fallin, L. (2015). Beyond books: the concept of academic library as learning space. New Library World, 117(5/6):208-220. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

14) Fjallbrant, N. (2000). Information literacy for scientists and engineers: experience of EDUCATE and DEDICATE. Programme, 34(3):257-268. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/search.htm

15) Idiodi, E. A. (2005). Approaches to information literacy acquisition in Nigeria. Library Review, 54(4):223-230. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/journals.htm

16) Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A. & Kashi-Nahanji, V. (2011). Does information technology affect the level of information literacy? Aslib Proceedings, 63(6):618-631. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/journals.htm

17) Joint, N. (2005). Traditional bibliographic instruction and today’s information users. Library Review, 54(7):397-402 Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/journals.htm

18) Jumonville, A. (2014). The role of faculty autonomy in a course integrated information literacy program. Reference Service Review, 42(4):536-551. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/journals.htm

19) Kanguha, E.M. (2016). Information literacy learning experiences of fourth-year psychology students in Kenyan universities. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Information Studies Programme, School of Social Sciences, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

20) Kargbo, J.A. (2001). Shaking the ivory tower: revisiting the role of academic libraries in Sierra Leon. Library Review, 50(2):90-94. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/journals.htm

21) Kuan-Nien, C. & Pie-Chun, L. (2011). Information literacy in university library user education. Aslib Proceedings: new information perspective, 63(4):399-418. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

22) Kuan-Nien, C. & Pie-Chun, L. (2011). Information literacy in university library user education. Aslib Proceedings: new information perspective, 63(4):399-418. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

23) Kuan-Nien, C., Pie-Chun, L. & Sung-Shan, C. (2011). Integrating library instruction into a problem-based learning curriculum. Aslib Proceedings: new information perspectives, 63(5):517-532. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

24) Malliari, A. & Nitsos, I. (2008). Contribution of information literacy programme to the education process: the case of Greek academic library. Library Management, 29(39):700-710. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

25) Meulemans, Y.N. & Carr, A. (2012). Not at your service: building genuine facultylibrarian partnerships. Reference Services Review, 41(1):80-90 available at www.emeraldinsights.com

26) Meulemans, Y.N. & Carr, A. (2012). Not at your service: building genuine faculty-librarian partnerships. Reference Services Review, 41(1):80-90 available at www.emeraldinsights.com

27) Moore, P. (1996). Information literacy: past approaches and present challenges. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 5:137-151

28) Moyo, M. & Mavodza, J. (2016). A comparative study of information literacy provision at university libraries in South Africa and the United Arab Emirates: A literature review, Library Review, 65(1/2):93-107. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com

29) Nabuyanda, M.M. (2011). Factors Inhibiting Promotion of a Reading Culture: A Study of Basic School Libraries in Lusaka. A Dissertation submitted to the University of Zambia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Library and Information Studies (MLIS).

30) Pinto, M. (2016). Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(2):227-247. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

31) Sinikara, K. & Jarvelainen, L. (2003). Information literacy development in Finland. Library Review, 52(7):333-339. Available at www.emeradinsight.com/journal.html/

32) Spiranec, S. & Zorica, M.B. (2010). Information literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement? Journal of documentation, 66(1):140-153. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

33) Stordy, P. (2015). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of documentation, 71(3):456-476. Available at www.emeradinsight.com/journal.html/

34) Stowe, B. (2011). I can’t find anything: towards establishing a continuum in curriculumintegrated library instruction. Reference Services Review, 39(1):81-97. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

35) Tripathi, M. & Kumar, S. (2014). Use of online resources at Jawaharlal Nehru University: a quantitative study. Program, 48(3):272-292. Available at www.emeradinsight.com/

36) Ukachi, N.B. (2015b). Information literacy of students as a correlate of their use of electronic resources in university libraries in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 33(3):486-501. Available at www.emeraldinsights.com/

Volume 05 Issue 08 August 2022

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.