• editor@ijmra.in
  • ISSN[Online] : 2643-9875  ||  ISSN[Print] : 2643-9840

Volume 05 Issue 03 March 2022

Possible Solutions to Challenges of Including Learners with Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Classrooms
MC Morena
National University of Lesotho, Faculty of Education
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i3-19

Google Scholar Download Pdf
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

As a major strategy towards the achievement of basic education for all, Lesotho introduced free and compulsory primary education, whereby many children were sent to school. The mountain kingdom of Lesotho implemented the Free and Compulsory Primary Education Policy in the year 2000 (McConkey&Mariga, 2011:18). The policy‘s main objectives are: [t]o make basic education accessible to all learners; to make education equitable in order to eliminate inequalities; to guarantee that every Mosotho child completes the primary education and ensure that education is affordable to Basotho. (McConkey&Mariga, 2011:18).

By implementing compulsory education, even learners with special educational needs were seen in high numbers in schools. This has brought a challenge to learners with special educational needs to learn in the same classrooms with other learners without special educational needs. This paper aims to explore the possible solutions to challenges of including learners with special educational needs in Lesotho mainstream classrooms and The paper is guided by the question: what are the possible solutions to the challenges of including learners with special educational needs in Lesotho mainstream classrooms?

REFERENCES

1) McConkey, R. and Mariga, L., 2011. Building social capital for inclusive education: Insights from Zanzibar. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(1),pp.12-19.

2) Moreeng, B. and Twala, C. 2014. Monuments as Spaces for Enhancing Social Justiceand Sustainable Learning in History Teaching: A Case of the Voortrekker Monument. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7):491.

3) Wink, J. 2005. Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. New York, NY:Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

4) McKernan, J.A. 2013. The origins of critical theory in education: Fabian socialism as social reconstructionism in nineteenth-century Britain. British journal of educationalstudies, 61(4):417-433.

5) McLaren, P. 2000. Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the pedagogy of revolution. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

6) McLaren, P. 2015. Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Routledge.

7) Aliakbari, M. and Faraji, E. 2011. Basic principles of critical pedagogy. In 2ndInternational Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social SciencesIPEDR (Vol. 17, pp. 78-85).

8) Giroux, H.A. 1997. Pedagogy and the politics of hope theory, culture, and schooling: Acritical reader. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

9) Carroll, A., Forlin, C. and Jobling, A. 2003. The impact of teacher training in special education on the attitudes of Australian preservice general educators towardspeople with disabilities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(3):65-79.

10) Browder, D.M., Wakeman, S.Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. and Algozzinexya,B.2006. Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitivedisabilities. Exceptional children, 72(4):392-408.

11) Burlò, E.T. 2010. Inclusive education, a qualitative leap. Lifespan andDisability, 13(2):203-221.

12) Forlin, C. 2006. Inclusive education in Australia ten years after Salamanca. EuropeanJournal of Psychology of Education, 21(3):265-277.

13) Motshekga, A. 2010. Statement by the Minister of Basic Education. Mrs AngieMotshekga.

14) Selesho, J.M. 2012. Inclusion of high school learners in the mainstream: Ecologicalniche. Anthropologist, 14(6):539-543.

15) Engelbrecht, P., Oswald, M., Swart, E. and Eloff, I. 2003. Including learners with intellectual disabilities: Stressful for teachers?. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50(3):293-308.

16) Oswald, M. and Swart, E. 2011. Addressing South African pre-service teachers‘sentiments, attitudes and concerns regarding inclusive education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58(4):389-403.

17) Walton, E. and Nel, N. 2012. What counts as inclusion? Africa Education Review, 9(1):1 -26.

18) Donohue, D. and Bornman, J. 2014. The challenges of realising inclusive education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(2):01 -14.

19) Stofile, S.Y. 2008. Factors affecting the implementation of inclusive education policy: Acase study in one province in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of the Western Cape.

20) Khoaeane, T.J. 2012. Challenges facing teachers with regard to the implementation of inclusive education in the Maseru district of Lesotho (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloemfontein: Central University of Technology, Free State.

21) Johnstone, C.J. and Chapman, D.W. 2009. Contributions and constraints to the implementation of inclusive education in Lesotho. International Journal ofDisability, Development and Education, 56(2):131 -148.

22) Mosia, P.A. 2014. Threats to inclusive education in Lesotho: An overview of policy and implementation challenges. Africa Education Review, 11(3):292-310.

23) Dickinson, D.K. and Brady, J.P. 2006. Toward effective support for language and literacy through professional development. Baltimore: Brookes.

24) Mariga, L. and Phachaka, L. 1993. Report of a feasibility study, Maseru, Lesotho: Lesotho Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar]

25) Raselimo, M. and Mahao, M. 2015. The Lesotho curriculum and assessment policy: Opportunities and threats. South African Journal of Education, 35(1):1 -12.

26) Walton, E. 2011. Getting inclusion right in South Africa. Intervention in School andClinic, 46(4):240-245.

27) Sharma, U., Loreman, T. and Forlin, C. 2012. Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1):12- 21.

28) Gillies, R.M. 2007. Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Australia:Sage.

29) Tileston, D.W. 2004. What every teacher should know about classroom management and discipline (Vol. 5). California: Corwin Press.

30) Allan, G. 2003. A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic journal of business research methods, 2(1):1 -10.

31) Naicker, S.M. 2005. Inclusive education in South Africa. Contextualising inclusiveeducation:230-251.

32) Walton, E. 2011. Getting inclusion right in South Africa. Intervention in School andClinic, 46(4):240-245.

33) Frederickson, N., Warren, L. and Turner, J. 2005. ―Circle of Friends‖—An Exploration of Impact Over Time. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21(3):197-217.

34) Majumdar, S.R., McAlister, F.A., Eurich, D.T., Padwal, R.S. and Marrie, T.J. 2006. Statins and outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia: population based prospective cohort study. Bmj, 333(7576):999.

35) Bonner, J. 2010. Taking a stand as a student-centered research university: Active and collaborative learning meets scholarship of teaching at the University of Alabama. The journal of general education, 59(4):183-192.

36) Hasselbring, T.S. and Glaser, C.H.W. 2000. Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. The Future of Children:102-122.

37) Hornby, G. and Witte, C. 2010. Parent involvement in rural elementary schools in NewZealand: A survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(6):771 -777.

38) Peters, S., Johnstone, C. and Ferguson, P. 2005. A Disability Rights in Education Model for evaluating inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education,9(2):139-160.

39) Morojele, P. 2012. Implementing free primary education in Lesotho: Issues andchallenges. Journal of Social Sciences, 32(1):37-45.

40) Sheldon, S.B. and Epstein, J.L. 2005. Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4):196-207.

41) Epstein, J.L. 1986. Parents‘ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. The elementary school journal, 86(3):277-294.

42) Epstein, J.L. 1992. School and Family Partnerships. Report No. 6. Boston: Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children‘ Learning.

43) Datta, A. 2015. New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‗Entrepreneurial urbanization‘in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1):3-22.

44) Westwood, P. and Graham, L. 2003. Inclusion of students with special needs: Benefits and obstacles perceived by teachers in New South Wales and South Australia. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 8(1):3-15.

45) Kim, Y.W. 2013. Inclusive education in Korea: policy, practice, and challenges. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(2), pp.79-81.

46) Ajuwon, P.M. 2008. Inclusive Education for Students with Disabilities in Nigeria: Benefits, Challenges and Policy Implications. International journal of special education, 23(3):11 -16.

47) Stubbs, S. 2008. Inclusive Education. Where there are few resources. Oslo: The Atlas Alliance. Viitattu, 17:2015.

48) Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. 2006. The how of the study: Building the research design. Designing qualitative research:55-101.

49) Whyte, W.F.E. 1991. Participatory action research. London: Sage.

50) Telford, K., Kralik, D. and Koch, T. 2006. Acceptance and denial: implications for people adapting to chronic illness: literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 55(4):457-464.

51) Vollman, A.L.R., Anderson, E.T. and McFarlane, J.M. 2004. Canadian community as partner: Theory and practice in nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

52) Kearney, J., Wood, L. and Zuber-Skerritt, O. 2013. Community–university partnerships: Using participatory action learning and action research (PALAR). Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 6(1):113-30.

53) Cargo, M. and Mercer, S.L. 2008. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 29:325-350.

54) Kompridis, N. 2006. Disclosure. Critical Theory between Past and Future. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

55) MacDonald, C. 2012. Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2):34- 50.

56) Mahlomaholo, S. 2009. Critical emancipatory research and academic identity. Africa education review, 6(2):224-237.

57) Nkoane, M.M. 2012. Critical emancipatory research for social justice and democratic citizenship. Perspectives in Education, 30(4):98-104.

58) Villa, R.A., Thousand, J.S. and Nevin, A. 2008. A guide to co-teaching: Practical tips for facilitating student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

59) Friend, M.P. and Cook, L. 1992. Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. New York: Longman.

60) Makoelle, T.M. 2016. Inclusive Teaching in South Africa. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media.

61) Okumbe, M.A. and Tsheko, G.N. 2010. The need for curriculum modifications for special needs learners in Botswana. International Journal Of Exceptional Children,25(1):4.

62) Cornelius-White, J. 2007. Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 77(1):113-143.

63) Kincheloe, J.L. 2005. Critical constructivism primer (Vol. 2). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

64) Aliakbari, M. and Faraji, E. 2011. Basic principles of critical pedagogy. In 2ndInternational Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social SciencesIPEDR (Vol. 17, pp. 78-85).

65) Degener, S.C. 2001. Making sense of critical pedagogy in adult literacy education. Annual review of adult learning and literacy, 2(1):26-62.

66) Will, M.C. 1986. Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional children, 52(5):411 -415.

Volume 05 Issue 03 March 2022

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Our Services and Policies

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.

The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.

Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 12 (December 2024).

PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 December 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online

Why with us

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis is better then other journals because:-
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.

The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

Indexed In
Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar