¹Rohana Muhammadah Hasan, ²Sumani,³Susanti

^1,2,3Economic and Business, Jember University, Jember

This study aims to determine the differences in the financial performance of state banks and national private banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2021 using the RGEC method. In addition, this study aims to determine the comparison between state banks and national private banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2021 which have better (healthier) financial performance using the RGEC method based on regulations set by the government. The sample used in this study is a sample taken by purposive sampling technique, the criteria used are banks that are included in the Top 500 Most Valuable Bank Brands 2021. There are 9 banks that meet the criteria consisting of 4 state banks and 5 national private banks. This study uses four aspects of the RGEC method, namely the risk profile (NPL & LDR), the GCG aspect which is measured using a composite rating, aspects of earnings (ROA), and aspects of capital (CAR). The results of the analysis of this study indicate that during 2018-2021, there are significant differences in financial performance in terms of NPL & CAR, while LDR, GCG, ROA show no significant differences in the financial performance of the two banks. National private banks have better (healthy) financial performance compared to state banks in 2018-2021.

Financial Performance, Risk Profile, Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital, Private Banking, Government Banking

1) Akhyar, Chairil, Marzuki, Azhar, and Ghazali Syamni. 2018. Pertumbuhan Laba Bank Syariah Indonesia: Dampak RGEC. Jurnal Internasional & Teknologi 7:587–91.

2) Amelia, Ratih, Indawati Lestari, and Nasib. 2019. Keuangan & Perbankan. Cetakan 1. edited by A. Sutira and Gunawan. Bandung: CV. Sadari.

3) Anjani, D. P., and R. Pakpahan. 2020. Komparasi Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah Dan Bank Swasta Nasional. Prosiding Industrial Research.

4) Anwar. 2018. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Dan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Bank Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Prosiding 4th Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Papers Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember (2014):29–46.

5) Attar, Dini, Islahuddin, and M. dan Shabri. 2014. Pengaruh Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. 3(1):10–20. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3589.4882.

6) Azizah, Tiara. 2018. Pengaruh Manajemen Risiko Dan Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013 – 2017. Skripsi, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

7) Bank Indonesia. 2006a. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 8/13/PBI/2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 7/3/PBI/2005 Tentang Batas Maksimum Pemberian Lredit Bank Umum. Peraturan Bank Indonesia.

8) Bank Indonesia. 2006b. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 8/4/Pbi/2006 Tentang Pelaksaan Good Corporate Governance Bagi Bank Umum. Peraturan Bank Indonesia.

9) Bank Indonesia. 2009. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No: 11/ 25 /PBI/2009 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 5/8/PBI/2003 Tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi Bank Umum. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 11/ 25 /Pbi/2009 28.

10) Bank Indonesia. 2011a. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. Peraturan Bank Indonesia 1–31.

11) Bank Indonesia. 2011b. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor:13/2/PBI/2011 Tentang Penetapan Status Dan Tindak Lanjut Pengawasan Bank.

12) Bastomi, Mohamad, Ubud Salim, and Siti Aisjah. 2017. The Role of Corporate Governance and Risk Management on Banking Financial Performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan 21(4):589–99. doi: 10.26905/jkdp.v21i4.1285.

13) bphn.go.id. 1998. Undang-Undang RI No. 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia 182.

14) Brand Finance. 2021. The Annual Report on The Most Valuable And Strongest Banking Brands 2021.

15) Dangnga, Muh. Taslim, and M. Ikhwan Maulana Haeruddin. 2018. Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan: Upaya Untuk Menciptakan Sistem Perbankan Yang Sehat. 1st ed. edited by A. Akbar. CV. Nur Lina.

16) Daryanto, Wiwiek Mardawiyah, Agung Sri Utami, and Tri Septia Rakhmawati. 2018. Banking Health Assessment of Commercial Banks in Indonesia Using RGEC Methods: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Business Studies 2(3):122–32. doi: 10.32924/ijbs.v2i3.76.

17) Dharmastuti, Christiana Fara. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Mekanisme Internal Dan External Corporate Governance Terhadap Profitabilitas Dan Kebijakan Dividen Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Go Publik Di Pasar Modal Indonesia). Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen 9(1):21–30.

18) Djakaria, Azzahra, and Kristianingsih. 2021. Analisis Komparatif Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah Pemerintah Dan Bank Umum Syariah Swasta Nasional Dengan Metode RGEC Periode 2015-2019. Jurnal Polban 12(Vol 12 (2021): Prosiding 12th Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar (IRWNS)):1568–73.

19) Faroza, Tara O., and Dessi Susanti. 2021. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah Dan Bank Swasta Nasional Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2019. EcoGen 4(3):445–55.

20) Faroza, Tara O., Dessi Susanti, Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi, and Universitas Negeri Padang. 2021. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah Dan Bank Swasta Nasional Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2019. 4(3):445–55.

21) Firdaus, Iwan, and Sunia Hedy Qumaira. 2020. The Analysis of Comparison of Bank Health Level Through Capital Approaches, Risk Profile, and Earnings in Conventional State-Owned Banks and National Private Banks Listed in IDX Period of 2012–2016. 120(Icmeb 2019):87–96. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200205.018.

22) Franita, Riska. 2018. Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Dan Nilai Perusahaan: Studi Untuk Perus... - Google Books. Cetakan Pe. edited by H. Wahyuni. Medan: Lembaga Penelitian dan Penulisan Ilmiah Aqli.

23) Gledistin, Eka, Yance Tawas, and Anita Kambey. 2021. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank BUMN Dan Swasta Dari Tahun 2014-2018 Menggunakan Rasio NPL, LDR, GCG, ROA, NIM Dan CAR. Jurnal Akuntansi Manado (JAIM) 2(2):176–86. doi: 10.53682/jaim. v2i2.1170.

24) Hidayati, Lina Nur. 2015. Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen 12:38–50.

25) Hussain, Arif, Anjum Ihsan, and Jawad Hussain. 2016. Risk Management and Bank Performance in Pakistan. NUML International Journal of Business & Management 11(2):68–80.

26) Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. 2016. Supervisi Manajemen Risiko Bank. Pertama. edited by Banker Association for Risk Management. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

27) Kansil, Kripen, Frendy A. O. Pelleng, and Joula J. Rogahang. 2020. “Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Untuk Menilai Kesehatan Bank Rakyat Indonesia Dengan Metode Rgec.” Productivity 1(3):291–96.

28) Kasmir. 2009. Bank Dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: PT RAJAGRAFIINDO PERSADA.

29) Lisa, Oyong, and Bambang Hermanto. 2020. Analysis of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) in Syariah Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks. International Journal of Social Science and Business 4(1):58–65. doi: 10.23887/ijssb.v4i1.23125.

30) Maghfiroh, Laila, and Muhammad Iqbal Surya Pratikto. 2022. Analisis Kesehatan Laporan Keuangan Pada PT BPR Syariah Buana Mitra Perwira Dengan Menggunakan Metode Camel Tahun 2016 – 2020. Manajerial 9(01):102. doi: 10.30587/manajerial.v9i01.3374.

31) Mardiana. 2018. Pengaruh Manajemen Risiko Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (Study Pada Perbankan Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di Bei). Iqtishoduna 14(2):151–66. doi: 10.18860/iq.v14i2.4940.

32) Mariana, Dela, and Gusganda Suria Manda. 2021. Pengaruh Risiko Likuiditas Dan Risiko Kredit Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (Studi Empires Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015- 2019). Jurnal Humaniora 4(2):244–55.

33) Maulana, Adi. 2022. “Pegawai Bank BUMN Diduga Pakai Uang Nasabah Rp 1,1 M Demi Binomo.” CNN Indonesia, April 5.

34) Mointi Renny. 2019. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah Dan Bank Swasta. 6:100–109.

35) Muniroh, D. W. I. Sahrul. 2021. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah (Bumn) Dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (Busn) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Rgec (Risk Profil E,Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital)Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-20. EKONOMIS : Journal of Economics and Business 2(1):13. doi: 10.33087/ekonomis.v2i2.44.

36) Mutiasari, Dea. 2019. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah Dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Di Indonesia Periode 2014 – 2018. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi 1(4).

37) Nasrum, Muhammad. 2018. Corporate Governance.

38) Ochieng, Ondigo Herich. 2016. The Influence of Credit Risk Management Strategies on the Performance of Commercial Banks: A Comparative Case Study of UAE and UK Commercial Banks.

39) Oktaviami, Rahayu Dwi, and Paskah Ika Nugroho. 2016. Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kinerja Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2014). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Manajemen & Bisnis.

40) Olalekan, Lasisi Isiaka, Lateef Olumide Mustapha, Marvis Irom Irom, and Bulus Ndio Emily. 2017. Corporate Board Size, Risk Management And Financial Performance Of Listed Deposit Money Banks In Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research 6(1):1–20.

41) Olamide, Olusanmi, Uwuigbe Uwalomwa, and Olubukunola Ranti Uwuigbe. 2014. The Effect of Risk Management on Bank’s Financial Performance in Nigeria. Vision 2020: Sustainable Growth, Economic Development, and Global Competitiveness - Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2014 1:2795–2806. doi: 10.5171/2015.239854.

42) Purnomo, Enyvia, Untung Sriwidodo, and Edi Wibowo. 2018. Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2016. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan 18(4):189–98.

43) Puspita, Adytya Ratna, and Saryadi. 2018. Uji Beda Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Antara Perbankan Syariah Indonesia Dengan Perbankan Syariah Malaysia. Diponegoro Journal Of Social And Political 1–8.

44) Putri, Andrani Dwi, and Aminar Sutra Dewi. 2012. Pengaruh Corporate Governance Dan Leverage Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Auditing 1–14. doi: 10.37301/jkaa.v0i0.5387.

45) R. Tarigan, Liyandri, and Chatarina Yekti Prawihatmi. 2017. Peran Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 10(2):125. doi: 10.26623/jreb.v10i2.1133.

46) Rohaida, Ida. 2019. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Nasional Dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi 15(1):15–29.

47) Saputri, Nadya Ayu, Rochmi Widayanti, and Ratna Damayanti. 2019. Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2014-2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika 3(02):352–63. doi: 10.29040/jie.v3i02.489.

48) Simatupang, Bachtiar. 2019. Peranan Perbankan Dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma 6(2):136–46.

49) Soyemi, Kenny Adedapo, Jumoke Omowunmi Ogunleye, and Faderera Oluwatoyin Ashogbon. 2014. Risk Management Practices and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Nigerian Deposit Money Banks ( DMBs ). The Business and Management Review 4(4):345–54.

50) Suciani, Debby, and Yulita Triadiarti. 2021. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Pemerintah (Bumn) Dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (Busn) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Rgec (Risk Profil E,Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital)Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-20. JAKPI - Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan & Perpajakan Indonesia 9(1):127. doi: 10.24114/jakpi.v9i1.25713.

51) Sudarmanto, Eko, Elly Susanti, Eka Revida, M. .. Pelu, Sukarma Purba, Astuti Bonaraja Purba, Marto Silalahi, Martono Anggusti, Parlin Dony Sipayung, and Astrie Krisnawati. 2021. U.S. Corporate Governance: 1st ed. edited by A. Karim and J. Simartama. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

52) Sugiono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D). cetakan ke. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

53) Sumani, Isti Fadah, and Ahmad Roziq. 2021. Good Corporate Governance: Struktur Modal Dan Kinerja Keuangan. Cetakan 1. edited by Alviana and Hakim. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Samudra Biru.

54) Syahuri Zein, Aliman, and Saparuddin Siregar. 2021. The Comparative Analysis Of Islamic Banking Performance Between CAMEL And RGEC Implementation. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Bisnis Islam 7(1):126–40.

55) Vyawahare, Ibu Manasi Jayant, and Dr Varsha Shriram Nerlekar. 2021. Impact of Good Corporate Governance Practices on the Financial Performance of Banks. Educational Journal XXIV(July):166–77.

56) Wanma, Johanis R., and Ghina Anggarini. 2019. Bank Pemerintah Dan Swasta Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). JUMABIS: Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis 3:46–66.

57) Widyastuti, Hindarsih, Kiki Afita Andriyani, and Farah Margaretha Leon. 2021. Dampak Manajemen Risiko Pada Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Konvensional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti 8(1):29–44. doi: 10.25105/jmat. v8i1.8148.

58) Wisdom, Okere, Isiaka Muideen, and Ogunlowere Akindele. 2019. Risk Management and Financial Performance of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. The International Journal of Business & Management 7(11):30–42. doi: 10.24940/theijbm/2019/v7/i11/bm1910-016.

59) Zain, Anjaninta, Jayanti Mandasari, Kata Kunci Npl, N. I. M. Car, Bank Bumn, and Busn Devisa. 2019. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Mandiri Tbk Dan Bank Sinarmas Tbk Periode 2015-2019 Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia. 06(01):1–5.

Volume 05 Issue 12 December 2022

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.