¹A. Akhtar,² MAR Howlider, ³AKFH Bhuiyan,⁴ MA Habib

¹Department livestock services (DLS), Farmagte, Dhaka 1213

²Dept. of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202

³Dept. of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202

⁴Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Savar, Dhaka 1341

Fast growing chicken suffers more in a hot humid condition than a slow growing one. The slow feathering affects the insulation mechanism of the chicken, thus enhance birds ability to dissipate heat during heat stress to a greater extent. As a consequence, slow feathered birds are more adaptive to hot humid environmental conditions. This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of incorporating early feather restriction gene (KS) in exotic population. A total of 34 slow feathered (SF) native chicks with KS gene of 28-day-old were collected from different villages and markets and were reared up to sexual maturity. After attaining sexual maturity, 2 males and 8 females of SF native chicken were randomly chosen to make a di-allelic cross with rapid feathered (RF) Rhode Island Red (RIR) and Fayoumi (FY). The crossbred progeny of each cross were reared up to 105 days to assess growth, survivability, heat tolerance and carcass yield under hot humid Bangladeshi condition. The collected data were arranged in a 3(genotype)×2(feather pattern)×9(age) factorial experiment in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and analyzed by SAS. Among genotypes, the highest survivability was obtained in Desi×Fayoumi (96.7%) and in SF chicks (96.1%) and the lowest in Desi×RIR (91.5%) and in RF chicks (90.5%). The SF chicks exhibited an average 8% heavier live weight than that of their RF counterparts. The cloacal temperature varied among genotypes and between feathering patterns (FP); being highest in Desi×RIR (430C) and in RF chicks (41.60C) and lowest in RIR×Desi (400C) and in SF chicks (41.40C). In case of Desi×RIR, RIR×Desi and Desi×Fayoumi, cloacal temperature increased linearly by 0.047, 0.044 and 0.0320C for each gram of live weight increase. Further, the cloacal temperature increased linearly by 0.036 and 0.0440C for the increase of each gram of live weight gain in case of RF and SF chicks, respectively. There was no significant (P>0.05) difference of dressing percentage for the effect of either genotype or FP (55.4% for SF vs. 46.6% for RF birds). Genotype and FP had significant effects (P<0.05; P<0.01) on total meat yield; being highest in Desi×RIR (24.6%) and in SF birds (26.2%) and lowest in Desi×Fayoumi (21.4%) and in RF birds (20.6%). Breast meat yield of SF birds (9.2%) was significantly (P<0.01) higher than that of RF birds (7.1%). The highest thigh meat yield was obtained in Desi×RIR (7.6%) and in SF birds (8.3%) and the lowest in Desi×Fayoumi (6.7%) and in RF counterparts (6.0%). The highest drumstick meat yield was obtained in RIR×Desi (5.6%) and in SF birds (5.9%) and the lowest in Desi×Fayoumi (5.0%) and in RF birds (4.8%). Genotype and FP had significant interaction effect on total meat yield as well as fractional meat yields. The study revealed that incorporation of ‘Ks’ gene in the exotic one by crossing with native chicken and rearing under hot humid environment may be a means of improving growth, survivability, heat tolerance and carcass yield.

Slow feathered gene, adaptability, body weight, meat yield.

1) Alam, M.S., Islam, M.S., Howlider, M.A.R. and Islam, M.A. 1995. The effect of dietary protein and energy on broiler and naked neck Australorp chicken in hot-humid environment. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 24(1-2): 173-183.

2) Barua, A. and Howlider, M.A.R. 1991. Meat yield of free range naked neck and full feathered Bangladeshi chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 61(7): 772-775.

3) Bohren, B.B., Rogler, J.C. and Carson, J.R. 1982. Survival under heat stress of lines selected for fast and slow growth at two temperatures. Poultry Science, 61: 1804-1808.

4) Charles, D.R. 1986. Temperature for broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 42(3): 249-258.

5) Cowan, P.J. and Michie, W. 1978. Environmental temperature and broiler performance. The use of diets containing increased amounts of protein. British Poultry Science, 19: 601-605.

6) Crawford, R.D. 1990. Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsveier Amstardam. pp. 187-188.

7) Daeton, J.W. and Recee, F.N. 1970. Whole house heat and humidity effects on broiler production. Proceedings of the University of Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers. March 19-20, 1970. pp. 12-16.

8) Dale, N.M. and Fuller, H.L. 1980. Effect of diet composition on feed intake and growth of chicks under heat stress. II. Constant Vs. Ctcling temperatures. Poultry Science, 59: 1434-1441.

9) Dunnington, E.A. and Siegel, P.B. 1986. Sex-linked-feathering alleles (K, K+ ) in chicks of diverse genetic backgrounds. I. Body temperatures and body weights. Poultry Science, 65(1-2): 209-214.

10) Godfrey, G.F. and Farnsworth, Jr. G.M. 1952. Relation of the sex-linked rapid-feathering gene to chick growth and mortality. Poultry Science, 31: 65-68.

11) Horst, P. and Rouen, H.W. 1986. Significance of Naked neck (“Na” gene) in Poultry Breeding in the tropics. Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference (Paris) 1: 191-195.

12) Hossain, M.M., Howlider, M.A.R. and Hossain, M.J. 1991. The growth performance and meat yield of naked neck Australorps and broiler chickens in a hot-humid environment. The Bangladesh Veterinarian, 8(1-2): 4-7.

13) Howlider, M.A.R. and Rose, S.P. 1987. Temperature and growth of broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 43(3): 228- 237.

14) Hurry, H.F. and Nordskog, A.W. 1953. A genetic analysis of chick-feathering and its influence on growth rate. Poultry Science, 32: 18-25.

15) Merat, P. 1959. The role of the autosomal feathering factor in weights increase in the fowl. Animal Breeding Abstract, 28(2): 196.

16) Merat, P. 1970. Mendelian genetics and selection for quantitative traits in Poultry Results and Perspective. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 26: 571-586.

17) Merat, P. 1986. Potential usefulness of the Na (naked neck) gene on the poultry production. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 42: 124-142.

18) Romijin, C. 1950. Tijdshr Diergeneesk 75: 719-745. (Cited by B.M. Freeman). In: Physiology and Biochemistry of domestic fowl. 1971. Vol. 3. Edit. B.J. Bell and B.M. Freeman, Academic Press, London and New York.

19) SAS. 1990. Users Guide, SAS Institute. Inc. Version 6.03, Carry, North Carolina, USA.

20) Sergeev, V.A. and Repina, N.V. 1990. The effectiveness of auto sexing in broilers. Poultry Abstract, 17(1): 11.

21) Sheridan, A.K. and McDonald, M.W. 1963. The relationship between feathering and body weight in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 42: 1468-1471.

22) Siegel, P.B., Muller, C.D. and Craig, J.V. 1957. Some phenotypic differences among homozygous, heterozygous and hemizygous late feathering chicks. Poultry Science, 36: 232-239.

23) Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. Mc grow-Hill Book Company, Inc. United States of America.

24) Verma, S.K. and Prasad, R.S. 1981. Study on some of the characters of slow feathering and rapid feathering birds. Poultry Abstract, 8(7): 232.

25) Verma, S.K. and Singh, G.S.P. 1983. Effect of rapid and slow-feathering on some economic traits in White Leghorn RIR crosses. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 63: 105-106.

26) Warren, D.C. 1925. Inheritance of rate of feathering in poultry. Journal of Heredity, 16: 13-18.

27) Yoshida, S. and Saito, K. 1983. The effect of sex linked bantan gene dwB on economic traits in sebright bantan crosses. Poultry Abstract, 11(5): 104.

VOLUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2021