Dirhamsyah

Maritime Adiguna Polytechnic

The productivity of human resources needs to be continuously improved through various sustainable efforts. The work environment is one of the important efforts to increase teacher productivity. Schools need to pay attention to the work environment so that teacher productivity increases, both physical and non-physical environments. This research will be carried out at the Adiguna Maritim Polytechnic, which will be held in March 2019. The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the adjusted value of the R square is 0.501 or 50.1%. This shows that the Work Environment Variable (X1) and the Leadership Style Variable (X2) can explain the Work Productivity Variable (Y) by 50.1%, the rest 49.9% (100% - 50.1%) is true by other variables outside the research model. (2) The results of the t test (partial) show that t (2.528)> t table (1.697), as well as the significance value of 0.017 <0.05, it can reject the first hypothesis accepted, meaning that the Work Environment Variable (X1) affects the Work Productivity (Y) is accepted. (3) The results of the t test (partial) show that t count (4.269)> t table (1.697), and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, it can be rejected that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the leadership style variable (X2) affects the work productivity variable. (Y). (4) The results of the simultaneous test (F) can be seen that Fcount (16,585)> Ftable (3,295), and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, it can be rejected for the third acceptance, meaning that the Work Environment Variable (X1), the Leadership Style Variable (X2 ) influence jointly (simultaneously) on the Work Productivity Variable (Y).

Work Environment, Leadership Style and Work Productivity

1) Abdullah, Zainuddin et al. November 2012. "The Effect of Job Stress on Auditor Performance Through Work Motivation as an Intervening Variable (Study on Internal Auditors in the Government of Aceh Province)". ISSN Journal of Accounting.

2) Agustin, Ririn Pratiwi. 2014. The relationship between work productivity and career development for employees of PT. Bank Mandiri Tarakan: Psychology ejournal.

3) Anoraga, Panji. 2009. Psychology of Leadership. Rineka Cipta. Semarang:

4) Arbi, Syarif. 2013. Human Resource Management. BPFE. Yogyakarta

5) Arep, Ishak and Hendri Tanjung. 2013. Human Resource Management. Second Edition, BPEC. Yogyakarta.

6) Babic, S., Alka J.M., D.M. Pavlovic and Macan K.M. 2014. Determination of pKa Values of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 26 (11).

7) Bambang Wahyudi. 2010. Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Sulita.

8) Damayanti, Deni. 2013. Human Resource Management. Alaska. Yogyakarta:

9) Dharma, Agus. 2013. Organizational Behavior Management: Human Resources Empowerment, Fourth Edition, Erlanggan Publisher, Jakarta.

10) Diana Khairani Sofyan. 2013. Production Planning and Control, First Edition, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta

11) Edy, Sutrisno. 2011. Human Resource Management. Publisher: Kencana. Jakarta

12) Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Application of Multivariate Analysis with SPSS Program, Fourth Edition, Diponegoro University Publisher.

13) Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2016. Human Resource Management. Revised Edition. Publisher PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta

14) Kartono, Kartini. 2011. Leaders and Leadership. PT raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

VOLUME 04 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2021