Makiliwè Barcola

This paper analyzes the relationship between the demand for tobacco, its price and the economic factors that may influence it. The objective is to understand the response of consumers to an increase in tobacco prices. The price increase is assumed to be caused by the effect of increasing tobacco taxes, which is a major tobacco control policy. This paper also analyzes the reaction of smokers to an increase in the prices of other goods in the economy. To achieve this objective, we estimate the elasticities of these factors through the tobacco demand models proposed in the literature. The price of tobacco, consumer income per capita, the price of goods such as food and health care, and the strengthening of anti-smoking laws are among the variables used to estimate the demand equations for tobacco. The results of the estimations indicate first that the demand for tobacco is highly elastic with respect to its price; the price elasticity is estimated at -1.368. Tobacco demand is also sensitive to consumer income and the strengthening of anti-smoking laws. In contrast, changes in the prices of other non-addictive goods in the economy, such as food, have no influence on the demand for tobacco products. This means that when the price of other products increases, smokers are likely to reduce the quantity of these products consumed in order to maintain their level of tobacco consumption.

Tobacco, Elasticity and Demand.

1) Atkinson, A. B., & Skegg, J. L. (1973). Anti‐smoking publicity and the demand for tobacco in the UK. The Manchester School, 41(3), 265-282.

2) Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. (1999). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy.

3) Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1991). Rational addiction and the effect of price on consumption. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 237-241.

4) Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of political Economy, 96(4), 675-700.

5) Chelwa, G., & van Walbeek, C. (2019). Does cigarette demand respond to price increases in Uganda? Price elasticity estimates using the Uganda National Panel Survey and Deaton’s method. BMJ open, 9(3), e026150.

6) Chaloupka, F. J., Straif, K., & Leon, M. E. (2011). Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 20(3), 235-238.

7) Chaloupka, F. J., & Warner, K. E. (2000). The economics of smoking. Handbook of health economics, 1, 1539-1627.

8) Ciecierski, Christina U.; Chaloupka, Frank Joseph; Yurekli, Ayda Aysun; De Beyer, Joy Antoinette. 2001. Data for economic analysis (English). World Bank economics of tobacco toolkit; no. 2. tobacco data. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.

9) Dupilet, C., Grignon, M., & Pierrard, B. (2002). Modèles économiques et politiques de lutte contre le tabagisme. CREDES.

10) Farrelly, M., Bray, J., Pechacek, T., & Woollery, T. (2001). Response by Adults to Increases in Cigarette Prices by Sociodemographic Characteristics. Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), 156-165. doi:10.2307/1061518

11) Kopp, P. (2006) Analyse économique du comportement du fumeur, Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne C.E.S., Université de Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.

12) Krugman, D. M., Fox, R. J., Fletcher, J. E., Fischer, P. M., & Rojas, T. H. (1994). Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye-tracking approach. Journal of advertising research, 34(6), 39-52.

13) Laporte, A., Dass, A. R., & Ferguson, B. S. (2017). Is the Rational Addiction model inherently impossible to estimate?. Journal of health economics, 54, 161-175.

14) Martinez, E., Mejia, R., & Pérez-Stable, E. J. (2015). An empirical analysis of cigarette demand in Argentina. Tobacco control, 24(1), 89-93.

15) Mehrotra, R., Yadav, A., Sinha, D. N., Parascandola, M., John, R. M., Ayo-Yusuf, O., ... & Siddiqi, K. (2019). Smokeless tobacco control in 180 countries across the globe: call to action for full implementation of WHO FCTC measures. The Lancet Oncology, 20(4), e208-e217.

16) Peto, J. (1974). Price and consumption of cigarettes: a case for intervention?. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 28(4), 241-245.

17) Showalter, M. H. (1999). Firm behavior in a market with addiction: The case of cigarettes. Journal of health economics, 18(4), 409-427.

18) Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. The american economic review, 67(2), 76-90.

19) Wangen, K. R. (2004). Some fundamental problems in Becker, Grossman and Murphy's implementation of rational addiction theory (No. 375). Discussion Papers.

20) Wilkins, N., Yurekli, A., & Hu, T. W. (2004). Economic analysis of tobacco demand. Economics of Tobacco Toolkit, 80576.

VOLUME 04 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2021